linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] qcom: spmi-regulator: Add support for ULT LV

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <161464183214.31485.10412405040146742381.b4-ty@kernel.org>
Date:   Mon, 01 Mar 2021 23:37:12 +0000
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...ainline.org>,
        phone-devel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     martin.botka@...ainline.org, Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
        angelogioacchino.delregno@...ainline.org,
        ~postmarketos/upstreaming@...ts.sr.ht,
        marijn.suijten@...ainline.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
        Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] qcom: spmi-regulator: Add support for ULT LV_P50 and ULT P300

On Thu, 25 Feb 2021 22:35:13 +0100, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> The ULT LV_P50 shares the same configuration as the other ULT LV_Pxxx
> and the ULT P300 shares the same as the other ULT Pxxx.
> 
> These two regulator types are found on PM8950 and its variants.

Applied to

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/regulator.git for-next

Thanks!

[1/1] qcom: spmi-regulator: Add support for ULT LV_P50 and ULT P300
      commit: b15d870510c0a3910c9980ebceab885a390af60c

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark