lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87tupu36xi.fsf@meer.lwn.net>
Date:   Mon, 01 Mar 2021 14:22:49 -0700
From:   Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
To:     Dwaipayan Ray <dwaipayanray1@...il.com>, joe@...ches.com,
        mchehab@...nel.org
Cc:     lukas.bulwahn@...il.com,
        linux-kernel-mentees@...ts.linuxfoundation.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
        Dwaipayan Ray <dwaipayanray1@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 0/3] checkpatch: add verbose mode

Dwaipayan Ray <dwaipayanray1@...il.com> writes:

> Add a new verbose mode to checkpatch. The verbose test
> descriptions are read from the new checkpatch documentation
> file at `Documentation/dev-tools/checkpatch.rst`, which
> is also added by this series.

So I can certainly take the doc change, as requested.  Remind me,
though...should I apply the whole set, or will the checkpatch changes go
via another path?

Thanks,

jon

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ