linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v8 0/3] checkpatch: add verbose mode

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <70877984ec78d837159dc643e3ae2b05fd91561c.camel@perches.com>
Date:   Mon, 01 Mar 2021 13:53:35 -0800
From:   Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To:     Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        Dwaipayan Ray <dwaipayanray1@...il.com>, mchehab@...nel.org
Cc:     lukas.bulwahn@...il.com,
        linux-kernel-mentees@...ts.linuxfoundation.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 0/3] checkpatch: add verbose mode

On Mon, 2021-03-01 at 14:22 -0700, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> Dwaipayan Ray <dwaipayanray1@...il.com> writes:
> 
> > Add a new verbose mode to checkpatch. The verbose test
> > descriptions are read from the new checkpatch documentation
> > file at `Documentation/dev-tools/checkpatch.rst`, which
> > is also added by this series.
> 
> So I can certainly take the doc change, as requested.  Remind me,
> though...should I apply the whole set, or will the checkpatch changes go
> via another path?

There's no dedicated upstream path for checkpatch.
So please take the checkpatch changes too.