linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] ASoC: Intel: boards: sof-wm8804: add check for PLL setting

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <161464168097.31144.7451844470598305958.b4-ty@kernel.org>
Date:   Mon, 01 Mar 2021 23:34:40 +0000
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     alsa-devel@...a-project.org, Jie Yang <yang.jie@...ux.intel.com>,
        Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>,
        Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com>,
        Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>,
        Colin King <colin.king@...onical.com>,
        Liam Girdwood <liam.r.girdwood@...ux.intel.com>,
        Cezary Rojewski <cezary.rojewski@...el.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: Intel: boards: sof-wm8804: add check for PLL setting

On Fri, 26 Feb 2021 18:56:53 +0000, Colin King wrote:
> Currently the return from snd_soc_dai_set_pll is not checking for
> failure, this is the only driver in the kernel that ignores this,
> so it probably should be added for sake of completeness.  Fix this
> by adding an error return check.

Applied to

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git for-next

Thanks!

[1/1] ASoC: Intel: boards: sof-wm8804: add check for PLL setting
      commit: e067855b814600248234a2a7283a7a9006e5aadc

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark