linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] sound: soc/uniphier: Simplify the return expression of uniphier_aio

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <161464168096.31144.10521204916240412508.b4-ty@kernel.org>
Date:   Mon, 01 Mar 2021 23:34:40 +0000
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     tiwai@...e.com, dingsenjie@....com, lgirdwood@...il.com,
        perex@...ex.cz
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dingsenjie <dingsenjie@...ong.com>,
        alsa-devel@...a-project.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sound: soc/uniphier: Simplify the return expression of uniphier_aio_startup

On Wed, 24 Feb 2021 16:54:07 +0800, dingsenjie@....com wrote:
> Simplify the return expression in the aio-cpu.c.

Applied to

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git for-next

Thanks!

[1/1] sound: soc/uniphier: Simplify the return expression of uniphier_aio_startup
      commit: e3fdb6288dd08d965dea4bf00186e20f79153b2b

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark