[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210302161239.GM4522@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2021 16:12:39 +0000
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Sameer Pujar <spujar@...dia.com>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Jon Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@...esas.com>,
Linux-ALSA <alsa-devel@...a-project.org>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 3/5] ASoC: audio-graph-card: Add bindings for sysclk
and pll
On Tue, Mar 02, 2021 at 12:33:04PM +0530, Sameer Pujar wrote:
> This was targetted for external audio codecs. Their internal clock
> management is not exposed with the clock framework. Instead ASoC provides
> callbacks to set this up on Codec side. There are many references where this
> is followed with some hardcoded settings in the drivers.
> Are you suggesting to instead expose codec internal clocks and manage via
> generic clock bindings? Would this mean each codec driver has to implement
> these clock APIs (for ex: set_rate()) and program registers accordingly?
Yes, that's what we should be doing.
> For a platform, different audio cards can be plugged in. In that case, each
> codec has to be updated to follow this. Wouldn't it be simpler to use
> available ASoC callbacks?
If we want to use standard DT to describe things we need to use standard
bindings to do it.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists