[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAL_Jsq+o73atGxyj2Xpwb8rFj5m0AEQrvJWEyEU1UCXqnm5k1A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2021 13:58:21 -0600
From: Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>
To: Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenzjulienne@...e.de>
Cc: Álvaro Fernández Rojas <noltari@...il.com>,
Matt Mackall <mpm@...enic.com>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Ray Jui <rjui@...adcom.com>,
Scott Branden <sbranden@...adcom.com>,
"maintainer:BROADCOM BCM7XXX ARM ARCHITECTURE"
<bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com>,
Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
Nícolas F. R. A. Prado
<nfraprado@...tonmail.com>,
Rikard Falkeborn <rikard.falkeborn@...il.com>,
Stefan Wahren <stefan.wahren@...e.com>,
"open list:HARDWARE RANDOM NUMBER GENERATOR CORE"
<linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
"moderated list:BROADCOM BCM2835 ARM ARCHITECTURE"
<linux-rpi-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] dt-bindings: rng: bcm2835: document reset support
On Thu, Mar 4, 2021 at 6:07 AM Nicolas Saenz Julienne
<nsaenzjulienne@...e.de> wrote:
>
> Hi Alvaro,
>
> On Tue, 2021-02-23 at 18:00 +0100, Álvaro Fernández Rojas wrote:
> > Some devices may need to perform a reset before using the RNG, such as the
> > BCM6368.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Álvaro Fernández Rojas <noltari@...il.com>
> > ---
> > v3: make resets required if brcm,bcm6368-rng.
> > v2: document reset support.
> >
> > .../devicetree/bindings/rng/brcm,bcm2835.yaml | 17 +++++++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/rng/brcm,bcm2835.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/rng/brcm,bcm2835.yaml
> > index c147900f9041..11c23e1f6988 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/rng/brcm,bcm2835.yaml
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/rng/brcm,bcm2835.yaml
> > @@ -37,6 +37,21 @@ required:
> >
> >
> > additionalProperties: false
>
> I can't claim I fully understand all the meta stuff in shemas, so I generally
> just follow the patterns already available out there. That said, shoudln't this
> be at the end, just before the examples? Maybe the cause of that odd warning
> you got there?
Yes, 'resets' needs to be defined under 'properties' as
additionalProperties can't 'see' into if/then schemas. The top level
needs to define everything and then if/then schema just add additional
constraints.
>
> > +if:
> > + properties:
> > + compatible:
> > + enum:
> > + - brcm,bcm6368-rng
> > +then:
> > + properties:
> > + resets:
> > + maxItems: 1
> > + required:
> > + - resets
>
> I belive you can't really make a property required when the bindings for
> 'brcm,bcm6368-rng' were already defined. This will break the schema for those
> otherwise correct devicetrees.
Right, unless not having the property meant the device never would have worked.
Rob
Powered by blists - more mailing lists