[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YD/g2G3Yi8o99f7H@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2021 20:17:44 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Julien Thierry <jthierry@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
catalin.marinas@....com, will@...nel.org, mark.rutland@....com,
ardb@...nel.org, masahiroy@...nel.org, jpoimboe@...hat.com,
ycote@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 00/13] objtool: add base support for arm64
On Wed, Mar 03, 2021 at 06:09:19PM +0100, Julien Thierry wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This series enables objtool to start doing stack validation on arm64
> kernel builds.
> -->
>
> Julien Thierry (12):
> tools: Add some generic functions and headers
> tools: arm64: Make aarch64 instruction decoder available to tools
> tools: bug: Remove duplicate definition
> objtool: arm64: Add base definition for arm64 backend
> objtool: arm64: Decode add/sub instructions
> objtool: arm64: Decode jump and call related instructions
> objtool: arm64: Decode other system instructions
> objtool: arm64: Decode load/store instructions
> objtool: arm64: Decode LDR instructions
> objtool: arm64: Accept padding in code sections
> objtool: arm64: Handle supported relocations in alternatives
> objtool: arm64: Ignore replacement section for alternative callback
>
> Raphael Gault (1):
> objtool: arm64: Enable stack validation for arm64
These patches look very reasonable to me,
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
One selfish thing, would it make sense to have a make target that builds
all supported srcarch targets?
This might be useful when hacking on objtool to make sure everything
builds.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists