[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210304001141.7lejurony2poqkid@archlinux-ax161>
Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2021 17:11:41 -0700
From: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>
To: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org, clang-built-linux@...glegroups.com,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] kbuild: collect minimum tool versions into
scripts/tool-version.sh
On Thu, Mar 04, 2021 at 03:33:31AM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> The kernel build uses various tools, many of which are provided by the
> same software suite, for example, LLVM and Binutils.
>
> When we raise the minimal version of Clang/LLVM, we need to update
> clang_min_version in scripts/cc-version.sh and also lld_min_version in
> scripts/ld-version.sh.
>
> In fact, Kbuild can handle CC=clang and LD=ld.lld independently, and we
> could manage their minimal version separately, but it does not make
> much sense.
>
> Make scripts/tool-version.sh a central place of minimum tool versions
> so that we do not need to touch multiple files.
>
> This script prints the minimal version of the given tool.
>
> $ scripts/tool-version.sh gcc
> 4.9.0
> $ scripts/tool-version.sh llvm
> 10.0.1
> $ scripts/tool-version.sh binutils
> 2.23.0
> $ scripts/tool-version.sh foo
> foo: unknown tool
>
> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>
Reviewed-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>
Two comments below.
> ---
>
> scripts/cc-version.sh | 20 +++++---------------
> scripts/ld-version.sh | 11 ++++-------
> scripts/tool-version.sh | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
> create mode 100755 scripts/tool-version.sh
>
> diff --git a/scripts/cc-version.sh b/scripts/cc-version.sh
> index 3f2ee885b116..4772f1ef9cac 100755
> --- a/scripts/cc-version.sh
> +++ b/scripts/cc-version.sh
> @@ -6,18 +6,6 @@
>
> set -e
>
> -# When you raise the minimum compiler version, please update
> -# Documentation/process/changes.rst as well.
> -gcc_min_version=4.9.0
> -clang_min_version=10.0.1
> -icc_min_version=16.0.3 # temporary
> -
> -# https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63293
> -# https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210107111841.GN1551@shell.armlinux.org.uk
> -if [ "$SRCARCH" = arm64 ]; then
> - gcc_min_version=5.1.0
> -fi
> -
> # Print the compiler name and some version components.
> get_compiler_info()
> {
> @@ -48,18 +36,20 @@ set -- $(get_compiler_info "$@")
>
> name=$1
>
> +tool_version=$(dirname $0)/tool-version.sh
I realize these scripts are currently called by their full path but is
it worth making this '$(dirname "$(readlink -f "$0")")' here and in
ld-version.sh just in case that does not happen?
> case "$name" in
> GCC)
> version=$2.$3.$4
> - min_version=$gcc_min_version
> + min_version=$($tool_version gcc)
> ;;
> Clang)
> version=$2.$3.$4
> - min_version=$clang_min_version
> + min_version=$($tool_version llvm)
> ;;
> ICC)
> version=$(($2 / 100)).$(($2 % 100)).$3
> - min_version=$icc_min_version
> + min_version=$($tool_version icc)
> ;;
> *)
> echo "$orig_args: unknown compiler" >&2
> diff --git a/scripts/ld-version.sh b/scripts/ld-version.sh
> index a463273509b5..e824f7675693 100755
> --- a/scripts/ld-version.sh
> +++ b/scripts/ld-version.sh
> @@ -6,11 +6,6 @@
>
> set -e
>
> -# When you raise the minimum linker version, please update
> -# Documentation/process/changes.rst as well.
> -bfd_min_version=2.23.0
> -lld_min_version=10.0.1
> -
> # Convert the version string x.y.z to a canonical 5 or 6-digit form.
> get_canonical_version()
> {
> @@ -35,10 +30,12 @@ set -- $("$@" --version)
> IFS=' '
> set -- $1
>
> +tool_version=$(dirname $0)/tool-version.sh
> +
> if [ "$1" = GNU -a "$2" = ld ]; then
> shift $(($# - 1))
> version=$1
> - min_version=$bfd_min_version
> + min_version=$($tool_version binutils)
> name=BFD
> disp_name="GNU ld"
> elif [ "$1" = GNU -a "$2" = gold ]; then
> @@ -46,7 +43,7 @@ elif [ "$1" = GNU -a "$2" = gold ]; then
> exit 1
> elif [ "$1" = LLD ]; then
> version=$2
> - min_version=$lld_min_version
> + min_version=$($tool_version llvm)
> name=LLD
> disp_name=LLD
> else
> diff --git a/scripts/tool-version.sh b/scripts/tool-version.sh
> new file mode 100755
> index 000000000000..b4aa27e2c3d3
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/scripts/tool-version.sh
> @@ -0,0 +1,27 @@
> +#!/bin/sh
> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
> +#
> +# Print the minimum supported version of the given tool.
> +
> +set -e
> +
> +# When you raise the minimum version, please update
> +# Documentation/process/changes.rst as well.
> +gcc_min_version=4.9.0
> +llvm_min_version=10.0.1
> +icc_min_version=16.0.3 # temporary
> +binutils_min_version=2.23.0
> +
> +# https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63293
> +# https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210107111841.GN1551@shell.armlinux.org.uk
> +if [ "$SRCARCH" = arm64 ]; then
> + gcc_min_version=5.1.0
> +fi
> +
> +eval min_version="\$${1}_min_version"
> +if [ -z "$min_version" ]; then
> + echo "$1: unknown tool" >&2
> + exit 1
> +fi
> +
> +echo "$min_version"
> --
> 2.27.0
>
Would scripts/tool-version.sh be easier to read and interpret using a
case statement?
#!/bin/sh
# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
#
# Print the minimum supported version of the given tool.
# When you raise the minimum version, please update
# Documentation/process/changes.rst as well.
case "$1" in
binutils)
echo "2.23.0"
;;
gcc)
# https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63293
# https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210107111841.GN1551@shell.armlinux.org.uk
if [ "$SRCARCH" = arm64 ]; then
echo "5.1.0"
else
echo "4.9.0"
fi
;;
icc)
# temporary
echo "16.0.3"
;;
llvm)
echo "10.0.1"
;;
*)
echo "$1: unknown tool" >&2
exit 1
;;
esac
Powered by blists - more mailing lists