linux-kernel - [PATCH tip/core/rcu 6/6] rcuscale: Add kfree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20210304001134.22977-6-paulmck@kernel.org>
Date:   Wed,  3 Mar 2021 16:11:34 -0800
From:   paulmck@...nel.org
To:     rcu@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-team@...com, mingo@...nel.org,
        jiangshanlai@...il.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
        mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com, josh@...htriplett.org,
        tglx@...utronix.de, peterz@...radead.org, rostedt@...dmis.org,
        dhowells@...hat.com, edumazet@...gle.com, fweisbec@...il.com,
        oleg@...hat.com, joel@...lfernandes.org,
        "Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)" <urezki@...il.com>,
        "Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 6/6] rcuscale: Add kfree_rcu() single-argument scale test

From: "Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)" <urezki@...il.com>

The single-argument variant of kfree_rcu() is currently not
tested by any member of the rcutoture test suite.  This
commit therefore adds rcuscale code to test it.  This
testing is controlled by two new boolean module parameters,
kfree_rcu_test_single and kfree_rcu_test_double.  If one
is set and the other not, only the corresponding variant
is tested, otherwise both are tested, with the variant to
be tested determined randomly on each invocation.

Both of these module parameters are initialized to false,
so setting either to true will test only that variant.

Suggested-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Uladzislau Rezki (Sony) <urezki@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...nel.org>
---
 Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt | 12 ++++++++++++
 kernel/rcu/rcuscale.c                           | 15 ++++++++++++++-
 2 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt b/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
index 0454572..84fce41 100644
--- a/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
+++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
@@ -4259,6 +4259,18 @@
 	rcuscale.kfree_rcu_test= [KNL]
 			Set to measure performance of kfree_rcu() flooding.
 
+	rcuscale.kfree_rcu_test_double= [KNL]
+			Test the double-argument variant of kfree_rcu().
+			If this parameter has the same value as
+			rcuscale.kfree_rcu_test_single, both the single-
+			and double-argument variants are tested.
+
+	rcuscale.kfree_rcu_test_single= [KNL]
+			Test the single-argument variant of kfree_rcu().
+			If this parameter has the same value as
+			rcuscale.kfree_rcu_test_double, both the single-
+			and double-argument variants are tested.
+
 	rcuscale.kfree_nthreads= [KNL]
 			The number of threads running loops of kfree_rcu().
 
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/rcuscale.c b/kernel/rcu/rcuscale.c
index 06491d5..dca51fe 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/rcuscale.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/rcuscale.c
@@ -625,6 +625,8 @@ rcu_scale_shutdown(void *arg)
 torture_param(int, kfree_nthreads, -1, "Number of threads running loops of kfree_rcu().");
 torture_param(int, kfree_alloc_num, 8000, "Number of allocations and frees done in an iteration.");
 torture_param(int, kfree_loops, 10, "Number of loops doing kfree_alloc_num allocations and frees.");
+torture_param(bool, kfree_rcu_test_double, false, "Do we run a kfree_rcu() double-argument scale test?");
+torture_param(bool, kfree_rcu_test_single, false, "Do we run a kfree_rcu() single-argument scale test?");
 
 static struct task_struct **kfree_reader_tasks;
 static int kfree_nrealthreads;
@@ -644,10 +646,13 @@ kfree_scale_thread(void *arg)
 	struct kfree_obj *alloc_ptr;
 	u64 start_time, end_time;
 	long long mem_begin, mem_during = 0;
+	bool kfree_rcu_test_both;
+	DEFINE_TORTURE_RANDOM(tr);
 
 	VERBOSE_SCALEOUT_STRING("kfree_scale_thread task started");
 	set_cpus_allowed_ptr(current, cpumask_of(me % nr_cpu_ids));
 	set_user_nice(current, MAX_NICE);
+	kfree_rcu_test_both = (kfree_rcu_test_single == kfree_rcu_test_double);
 
 	start_time = ktime_get_mono_fast_ns();
 
@@ -670,7 +675,15 @@ kfree_scale_thread(void *arg)
 			if (!alloc_ptr)
 				return -ENOMEM;
 
-			kfree_rcu(alloc_ptr, rh);
+			// By default kfree_rcu_test_single and kfree_rcu_test_double are
+			// initialized to false. If both have the same value (false or true)
+			// both are randomly tested, otherwise only the one with value true
+			// is tested.
+			if ((kfree_rcu_test_single && !kfree_rcu_test_double) ||
+					(kfree_rcu_test_both && torture_random(&tr) & 0x800))
+				kfree_rcu(alloc_ptr);
+			else
+				kfree_rcu(alloc_ptr, rh);
 		}
 
 		cond_resched();
-- 
2.9.5