[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <AM6PR04MB4966041BFFDDAF1EF00BE1AD80969@AM6PR04MB4966.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Fri, 5 Mar 2021 14:09:55 +0000
From: Aisheng Dong <aisheng.dong@....com>
To: "Peng Fan (OSS)" <peng.fan@....nxp.com>,
"sboyd@...nel.org" <sboyd@...nel.org>,
"robh+dt@...nel.org" <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
"shawnguo@...nel.org" <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
"s.hauer@...gutronix.de" <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>
CC: "kernel@...gutronix.de" <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
"festevam@...il.com" <festevam@...il.com>,
dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@....com>,
"ulf.hansson@...aro.org" <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
"adrian.hunter@...el.com" <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
"linux-clk@...r.kernel.org" <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>,
Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH V3 4/5] dt-bindings: mmc: fsl-imx-esdhc: add clock
bindings
Hi Rob,
> From: Peng Fan (OSS) <peng.fan@....nxp.com>
> Sent: Thursday, February 25, 2021 11:10 AM
>
> From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>
>
> Add clock bindings for fsl-imx-esdhc yaml
>
> Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>
> ---
> .../devicetree/bindings/mmc/fsl-imx-esdhc.yaml | 11 +++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/fsl-imx-esdhc.yaml
> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/fsl-imx-esdhc.yaml
> index a7fbd8cc1e38..369471814496 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/fsl-imx-esdhc.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/fsl-imx-esdhc.yaml
> @@ -103,6 +103,17 @@ properties:
> Only eMMC HS400 mode need to take care of this property.
> default: 0
>
> + clocks:
> + maxItems: 3
> + description:
> + Handle clocks for the sdhc controller.
> +
> + clock-names:
> + items:
> + - const: ipg
> + - const: ahb
> + - const: per
One question:
The side effect of this patch is that it imposes a forced order of clk names
In DT which actually was not needed.
Do we really have to do that?
Or any other better approach to allow a random order to match the DT
usage better?
Regards
Aisheng
> +
> pinctrl-names:
> minItems: 1
> maxItems: 4
> --
> 2.30.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists