[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAL_JsqKK8t6XUqTuOKPzOviJbysqWqga_mdxWE0P0N4ejTgG=A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 5 Mar 2021 08:14:23 -0600
From: Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>
To: Aisheng Dong <aisheng.dong@....com>
Cc: "Peng Fan (OSS)" <peng.fan@....nxp.com>,
"sboyd@...nel.org" <sboyd@...nel.org>,
"shawnguo@...nel.org" <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
"s.hauer@...gutronix.de" <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
"kernel@...gutronix.de" <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
"festevam@...il.com" <festevam@...il.com>,
dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@....com>,
"ulf.hansson@...aro.org" <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
"adrian.hunter@...el.com" <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
"linux-clk@...r.kernel.org" <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>,
Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 4/5] dt-bindings: mmc: fsl-imx-esdhc: add clock bindings
On Fri, Mar 5, 2021 at 8:09 AM Aisheng Dong <aisheng.dong@....com> wrote:
>
> Hi Rob,
>
> > From: Peng Fan (OSS) <peng.fan@....nxp.com>
> > Sent: Thursday, February 25, 2021 11:10 AM
> >
> > From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>
> >
> > Add clock bindings for fsl-imx-esdhc yaml
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>
> > ---
> > .../devicetree/bindings/mmc/fsl-imx-esdhc.yaml | 11 +++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/fsl-imx-esdhc.yaml
> > b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/fsl-imx-esdhc.yaml
> > index a7fbd8cc1e38..369471814496 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/fsl-imx-esdhc.yaml
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/fsl-imx-esdhc.yaml
> > @@ -103,6 +103,17 @@ properties:
> > Only eMMC HS400 mode need to take care of this property.
> > default: 0
> >
> > + clocks:
> > + maxItems: 3
> > + description:
> > + Handle clocks for the sdhc controller.
> > +
> > + clock-names:
> > + items:
> > + - const: ipg
> > + - const: ahb
> > + - const: per
>
> One question:
> The side effect of this patch is that it imposes a forced order of clk names
> In DT which actually was not needed.
>
> Do we really have to do that?
Yes.
> Or any other better approach to allow a random order to match the DT
> usage better?
Why do you need random order?
We can not enforce the order, but we only do that when there's
multiple optional entries.
Rob
Powered by blists - more mailing lists