[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CABCJKud2eSr8ZfPxwa3XVTaJvAfYgydsWUu-AKo2gtNStQshFQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 5 Mar 2021 08:55:42 -0800
From: Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@...gle.com>
To: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>, Fangrui Song <maskray@...gle.com>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Julien Thierry <julien.thierry.kdev@...il.com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
kvmarm <kvmarm@...ts.cs.columbia.edu>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: arm64: Disable LTO in hyp
On Fri, Mar 5, 2021 at 6:22 AM Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 5 Mar 2021 at 12:38, Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, 05 Mar 2021 02:38:17 +0000,
> > Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@...gle.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, Mar 4, 2021 at 2:34 PM Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@...gle.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Mar 4, 2021 at 2:17 PM Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > On Thu, 04 Mar 2021 21:25:41 +0000,
> > > > > Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@...gle.com> wrote:
> >
> > [...]
> >
> > > > > > I assume hyp_panic() ends up being placed too far from __guest_enter()
> > > > > > when the kernel is large enough. Possibly something to do with LLVM
> > > > > > always splitting functions into separate sections with LTO. I'm not
> > > > > > sure why the linker cannot shuffle things around to make everyone
> > > > > > happy in this case, but I confirmed that this patch also fixes the
> > > > > > build issue for me:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/vhe/switch.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/vhe/switch.c
> > > > > > index af8e940d0f03..128197b7c794 100644
> > > > > > --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/vhe/switch.c
> > > > > > +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/vhe/switch.c
> > > > > > @@ -214,7 +214,7 @@ static void __hyp_call_panic(u64 spsr, u64 elr, u64 par)
> > > > > > }
> > > > > > NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(__hyp_call_panic);
> > > > > >
> > > > > > -void __noreturn hyp_panic(void)
> > > > > > +void __noreturn hyp_panic(void) __section(".text")
> > > > > > {
> > > > > > u64 spsr = read_sysreg_el2(SYS_SPSR);
> > > > > > u64 elr = read_sysreg_el2(SYS_ELR);
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > We're getting into black-magic territory here. Why wouldn't hyp_panic
> > > > > be in the .text section already?
> > > >
> > > > It's not quite black magic. LLVM essentially flips on
> > > > -ffunction-sections with LTO and therefore, hyp_panic() will be in
> > > > .text.hyp_panic in vmlinux.o, while __guest_enter() will be in .text.
> > > > Everything ends up in .text when we link vmlinux, of course.
> > > >
> > > > $ readelf --sections vmlinux.o | grep hyp_panic
> > > > [3936] .text.hyp_panic PROGBITS 0000000000000000 004b56e4
> > >
> > > Note that disabling LTO here has essentially the same effect as using
> > > __section(".text"). It stops the compiler from splitting these
> > > functions into .text.* sections and makes it less likely that
> > > hyp_panic() ends up too far away from __guest_enter().
> > >
> > > If neither of these workarounds sound appealing, I suppose we could
> > > alternatively change hyp/entry.S to use adr_l for hyp_panic. Thoughts?
> >
> > That would be an actual fix instead of a workaround, as it would
> > remove existing assumptions about the relative locations of the two
> > objects. I guess you need to fix both instances with something such
> > as:
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/entry.S b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/entry.S
> > index b0afad7a99c6..a43e1f7ee354 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/entry.S
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/entry.S
> > @@ -85,8 +85,10 @@ SYM_INNER_LABEL(__guest_exit_panic, SYM_L_GLOBAL)
> >
> > // If the hyp context is loaded, go straight to hyp_panic
> > get_loaded_vcpu x0, x1
> > - cbz x0, hyp_panic
> > -
> > + cbnz x0, 1f
> > + adr_l x0, hyp_panic
> > + br x0
> > +1:
>
> Agree with replacing the conditional branches that refer to external
> symbols: the compiler never emits those, for the reason we are seeing
> here, i.e., the range is simply insufficient.
>
> But let's just use 'b hyp_panic' instead, no?
Alright, this seems to work for me:
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/entry.S b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/entry.S
index b0afad7a99c6..c62265951467 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/entry.S
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/entry.S
@@ -85,8 +85,10 @@ SYM_INNER_LABEL(__guest_exit_panic, SYM_L_GLOBAL)
// If the hyp context is loaded, go straight to hyp_panic
get_loaded_vcpu x0, x1
- cbz x0, hyp_panic
+ cbnz x0, 1f
+ b hyp_panic
+1:
// The hyp context is saved so make sure it is restored to allow
// hyp_panic to run at hyp and, subsequently, panic to run in the host.
// This makes use of __guest_exit to avoid duplication but sets the
@@ -94,7 +96,7 @@ SYM_INNER_LABEL(__guest_exit_panic, SYM_L_GLOBAL)
// current state is saved to the guest context but it will only be
// accurate if the guest had been completely restored.
adr_this_cpu x0, kvm_hyp_ctxt, x1
- adr x1, hyp_panic
+ adr_l x1, hyp_panic
str x1, [x0, #CPU_XREG_OFFSET(30)]
get_vcpu_ptr x1, x0
But when I say work, I mean this fixes the allmodconfig build with
LTO, and my kernel boots at EL2. I don't actually have a way to
properly test KVM on arm64. If nobody sees obvious issues here, I can
send a proper patch a bit later.
> > // The hyp context is saved so make sure it is restored to allow
> > // hyp_panic to run at hyp and, subsequently, panic to run in the host.
> > // This makes use of __guest_exit to avoid duplication but sets the
> > @@ -94,7 +96,7 @@ SYM_INNER_LABEL(__guest_exit_panic, SYM_L_GLOBAL)
> > // current state is saved to the guest context but it will only be
> > // accurate if the guest had been completely restored.
> > adr_this_cpu x0, kvm_hyp_ctxt, x1
> > - adr x1, hyp_panic
> > + adr_l x1, hyp_panic
> > str x1, [x0, #CPU_XREG_OFFSET(30)]
> >
> > get_vcpu_ptr x1, x0
> >
> > which is completely untested. I wouldn't be surprised if there were
> > more of these somewhere.
> >
>
> A quick grep gives me
>
> $ objdump -r vmlinux.o |grep BR19
> 000000000005b6e0 R_AARCH64_CONDBR19 hyp_panic
> 0000000000418e08 R_AARCH64_CONDBR19 __memcpy
> 0000000000418e14 R_AARCH64_CONDBR19 __memcpy
These two are in __memmove. This shouldn't be an issue, at least with LTO.
> 0000000000003818 R_AARCH64_CONDBR19 __kvm_nvhe___guest_exit_panic
> 0000000000003898 R_AARCH64_CONDBR19 __kvm_nvhe___guest_exit_panic
> 0000000000003918 R_AARCH64_CONDBR19 __kvm_nvhe___guest_exit_panic
> 0000000000003998 R_AARCH64_CONDBR19 __kvm_nvhe___guest_exit_panic
> 0000000000003a18 R_AARCH64_CONDBR19 __kvm_nvhe___guest_exit_panic
> 0000000000003a98 R_AARCH64_CONDBR19 __kvm_nvhe___guest_exit_panic
> 0000000000003b18 R_AARCH64_CONDBR19 __kvm_nvhe___guest_exit_panic
> 0000000000003b98 R_AARCH64_CONDBR19 __kvm_nvhe___guest_exit_panic
> 0000000000003c10 R_AARCH64_CONDBR19 __kvm_nvhe___host_exit
> 0000000000003c1c R_AARCH64_CONDBR19 __kvm_nvhe___host_exit
> 00000000000064f0 R_AARCH64_CONDBR19 __kvm_nvhe_hyp_panic
> 000000000000078c R_AARCH64_CONDBR19 __kvm_nvhe___kvm_handle_stub_hvc
It looks like all the nvhe code is linked together into kvm_nvhe.o, so
I don't think these will cause problems either.
Sami
Powered by blists - more mailing lists