[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <49b4f4d9-3f49-efd0-ce44-c24d1ee3daa6@intel.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2021 15:48:46 -0800
From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
To: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@...nel.org>, linux-sgx@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
x86@...nel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/5] x86/sgx: Replace section->page_list with a global
free page list
On 3/3/21 7:03 AM, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> Background
> ==========
>
> EPC section is covered by one or more SRAT entries that are associated with
> one and only one PXM (NUMA node). The current implementation overheats a
Overheats?
> single NUMA node, because sgx_alloc_epc_page() always starts looking for
> pages from the same EPC section everytime.
"every time"
> Only within a section it does pick pages in FIFO fashion, i.e. the oldest
> freed in that section is the EPC page given back to the caller. That does
> not do any good, as the pages in the same node are performance-wise equal.
I'm not sure why all of this is relevant and it doesn't really tell me
anything about this patch's place in the *series*.
Why are we destroying all of the per-node structures just before adding
NUMA support?
> Replace local lists with a single global free page list, from which pages
> are borrowed in FIFO fashion.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists