linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 05/14] arm64: dts: qcom: sc7280: Add RSC and PDC devices

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 5 Mar 2021 11:12:37 +0530
From:   Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@...eaurora.org>
To:     Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>, agross@...nel.org,
        bjorn.andersson@...aro.org, robh+dt@...nel.org
Cc:     linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Maulik Shah <mkshah@...eaurora.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 05/14] arm64: dts: qcom: sc7280: Add RSC and PDC
 devices


On 3/4/2021 5:34 AM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> Quoting Rajendra Nayak (2021-03-03 04:17:49)
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi
>> index 4a56d9c..21c2399 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi
>> @@ -30,6 +31,18 @@
>>                  };
>>          };
>>   
>> +       reserved_memory: reserved-memory {
> 
> Do we plan to use this label at any point? I'd prefer we remove this
> until it becomes useful.

sure, i'll drop it

> 
>> +               #address-cells = <2>;
>> +               #size-cells = <2>;
>> +               ranges;
>> +
>> +               aop_cmd_db_mem: memory@...60000 {
>> +                       reg = <0x0 0x80860000 0x0 0x20000>;
>> +                       compatible = "qcom,cmd-db";
>> +                       no-map;
>> +               };
>> +       };
>> +
>>          cpus {
>>                  #address-cells = <2>;
>>                  #size-cells = <0>;
>> @@ -203,6 +229,7 @@
>>                          interrupt-controller;
>>                          #interrupt-cells = <2>;
>>                          gpio-ranges = <&tlmm 0 0 175>;
>> +                       wakeup-parent = <&pdc>;
>>   
>>                          qup_uart5_default: qup-uart5-default {
>>                                  pins = "gpio46", "gpio47";
>> @@ -287,6 +314,23 @@
>>                                  status = "disabled";
>>                          };
>>                  };
>> +
>> +               apps_rsc: rsc@...00000 {
> 
> Any better name than 'rsc'? Maybe 'power-controller'?

hmm, Maulik, any thoughts? This would perhaps need the bindings docs
to be updated as well (and maybe the existing platform DTs using rsc too)

> 
>> +                       compatible = "qcom,rpmh-rsc";
>> +                       reg = <0 0x18200000 0 0x10000>,
>> +                             <0 0x18210000 0 0x10000>,
>> +                             <0 0x18220000 0 0x10000>;
>> +                       reg-names = "drv-0", "drv-1", "drv-2";
>> +                       interrupts = <GIC_SPI 3 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
>> +                                    <GIC_SPI 4 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
>> +                                    <GIC_SPI 5 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
>> +                       qcom,tcs-offset = <0xd00>;
>> +                       qcom,drv-id = <2>;
>> +                       qcom,tcs-config = <ACTIVE_TCS  2>,
>> +                                         <SLEEP_TCS   3>,
>> +                                         <WAKE_TCS    3>,
>> +                                         <CONTROL_TCS 1>;
>> +               };
>>          };

-- 
QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member
of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation