[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YENReyBNFZJyRxQN@kroah.com>
Date: Sat, 6 Mar 2021 10:55:07 +0100
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, shuah@...nel.org, patches@...nelci.org,
lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de, jonathanh@...dia.com,
f.fainelli@...il.com, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.4 00/72] 5.4.103-rc1 review
On Fri, Mar 05, 2021 at 07:23:25PM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 05, 2021 at 01:21:02PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.103 release.
> > There are 72 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> >
> > Responses should be made by Sun, 07 Mar 2021 12:08:39 +0000.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> >
>
> Building arm:realview-pb-a8:realview_defconfig:realview_pb:mem512:arm-realview-pba8:initrd ... failed
> ------------
> Error log:
> kernel/rcu/tree.c:617:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'IRQ_WORK_INIT'; did you mean 'IRQ_WORK_BUSY'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> 617 | IRQ_WORK_INIT(late_wakeup_func);
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~
> | IRQ_WORK_BUSY
Thanks, will go fix this here too...
Powered by blists - more mailing lists