[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YENRioOC4RWvApuZ@kroah.com>
Date: Sat, 6 Mar 2021 10:55:22 +0100
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Samuel Zou <zou_wei@...wei.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux@...ck-us.net, shuah@...nel.org,
patches@...nelci.org, lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de,
jonathanh@...dia.com, f.fainelli@...il.com, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.4 00/72] 5.4.103-rc1 review
On Sat, Mar 06, 2021 at 08:57:00AM +0800, Samuel Zou wrote:
>
>
> On 2021/3/5 20:21, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.103 release.
> > There are 72 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> >
> > Responses should be made by Sun, 07 Mar 2021 12:08:39 +0000.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> >
> > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.4.103-rc1.gz
> > or in the git tree and branch at:
> > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.4.y
> > and the diffstat can be found below.
> >
> > thanks,
> >
> > greg k-h
>
> Our test CI monitored the 5.4.103-rc1, and compile failure on arm64 and x86:
>
> Kernel repo:
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git
> Branch: linux-5.4.y
> Arch: arm64/x86
> Version:
> Commit: 2e10dba9fe0e67740146f3b3be42ed9403a7636e
> Compiler: gcc version 7.3.0 (GCC)
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Kernel build failed, error log:
> kernel/rcu/tree.c:617:2: error: implicit declaration of function
> ‘IRQ_WORK_INIT’; did you mean ‘IRQ_WORK_BUSY’?
> [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> IRQ_WORK_INIT(late_wakeup_func);
> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~
> IRQ_WORK_BUSY
> kernel/rcu/tree.c:617:2: error: invalid initializer
Thanks for the report, will go fix this up...
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists