lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <871rcps8gy.wl-maz@kernel.org>
Date:   Mon, 08 Mar 2021 20:20:45 +0000
From:   Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
To:     Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
Cc:     Hector Martin <marcan@...can.st>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        catalin.marinas@....com, james.morse@....com, tglx@...utronix.de,
        will@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 0/8] arm64: Support FIQ controller registration

On Mon, 08 Mar 2021 17:52:32 +0000,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com> wrote:
> 
> On Fri, Mar 05, 2021 at 07:08:50PM +0900, Hector Martin wrote:
> > On 02/03/2021 19.12, Mark Rutland wrote:
> > > I'm hoping that we can get the first 2 patches in as a preparatory cleanup for
> > > the next rc or so, and then the rest of the series can be rebased atop that.
> > > I've pushed the series out to my arm64/fiq branch [4] on kernel.org, also
> > > tagged as arm64-fiq-20210302, atop v5.12-rc1.
> > 
> > Just a reminder to everyone that filesystems under v5.12-rc1 go explodey if
> > you use a swap file [1].
> > 
> > I don't care for the M1 bring-up series (we don't *have* storage), but it's
> > worth pointing out for other people who might test this.
> > 
> > Modulo that,
> > 
> > Tested-by: Hector Martin <marcan@...can.st>
> > 
> > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CAHk-=wjnzdLSP3oDxhf9eMTYo7GF-QjaNLBUH1Zk3c4A7X75YA@mail.gmail.com/
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> I've folded that in, with the series rebased to v5.12-rc2, tagged as
> arm64-fiq-20210308. I'm expecting that Marc will get the first couple of
> patches queued by rc4, so there's at least one rebase ahead.

Just pushed those two into -next, and planning to send them to tglx by
the end of the week.

Thanks,

	M.

-- 
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ