linux-kernel - Re: [PATCHv2 0/8] arm64: Support FIQ controller registration

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 8 Mar 2021 17:52:32 +0000
From:   Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
To:     Hector Martin <marcan@...can.st>
Cc:     linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        catalin.marinas@....com, james.morse@....com, maz@...nel.org,
        tglx@...utronix.de, will@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 0/8] arm64: Support FIQ controller registration

On Fri, Mar 05, 2021 at 07:08:50PM +0900, Hector Martin wrote:
> On 02/03/2021 19.12, Mark Rutland wrote:
> > I'm hoping that we can get the first 2 patches in as a preparatory cleanup for
> > the next rc or so, and then the rest of the series can be rebased atop that.
> > I've pushed the series out to my arm64/fiq branch [4] on kernel.org, also
> > tagged as arm64-fiq-20210302, atop v5.12-rc1.
> 
> Just a reminder to everyone that filesystems under v5.12-rc1 go explodey if
> you use a swap file [1].
> 
> I don't care for the M1 bring-up series (we don't *have* storage), but it's
> worth pointing out for other people who might test this.
> 
> Modulo that,
> 
> Tested-by: Hector Martin <marcan@...can.st>
> 
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CAHk-=wjnzdLSP3oDxhf9eMTYo7GF-QjaNLBUH1Zk3c4A7X75YA@mail.gmail.com/

Thanks!

I've folded that in, with the series rebased to v5.12-rc2, tagged as
arm64-fiq-20210308. I'm expecting that Marc will get the first couple of
patches queued by rc4, so there's at least one rebase ahead.

Mark.