linux-kernel - Re: [PATCHv2 0/8] arm64: Support FIQ controller registration

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <04ab9271-db3c-e6b5-2464-12cb8662bb33@marcan.st>
Date:   Fri, 5 Mar 2021 19:08:50 +0900
From:   Hector Martin <marcan@...can.st>
To:     Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     catalin.marinas@....com, james.morse@....com, maz@...nel.org,
        tglx@...utronix.de, will@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 0/8] arm64: Support FIQ controller registration

On 02/03/2021 19.12, Mark Rutland wrote:
> I'm hoping that we can get the first 2 patches in as a preparatory cleanup for
> the next rc or so, and then the rest of the series can be rebased atop that.
> I've pushed the series out to my arm64/fiq branch [4] on kernel.org, also
> tagged as arm64-fiq-20210302, atop v5.12-rc1.

Just a reminder to everyone that filesystems under v5.12-rc1 go explodey 
if you use a swap file [1].

I don't care for the M1 bring-up series (we don't *have* storage), but 
it's worth pointing out for other people who might test this.

Modulo that,

Tested-by: Hector Martin <marcan@...can.st>

[1] 
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CAHk-=wjnzdLSP3oDxhf9eMTYo7GF-QjaNLBUH1Zk3c4A7X75YA@mail.gmail.com/

-- 
Hector Martin (marcan@...can.st)
Public Key: https://mrcn.st/pub