[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <OSBPR01MB4600C6910F2AFFC5819C8145F7969@OSBPR01MB4600.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Fri, 5 Mar 2021 10:09:20 +0000
From: "nakamura.shun@...itsu.com" <nakamura.shun@...itsu.com>
To: John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com>,
"will@...nel.org" <will@...nel.org>,
"mathieu.poirier@...aro.org" <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>,
"leo.yan@...aro.org" <leo.yan@...aro.org>,
"peterz@...radead.org" <peterz@...radead.org>,
"mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>,
"acme@...nel.org" <acme@...nel.org>,
"mark.rutland@....com" <mark.rutland@....com>,
"alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com"
<alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
"jolsa@...hat.com" <jolsa@...hat.com>,
"namhyung@...nel.org" <namhyung@...nel.org>
CC: "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 2/4] perf tools: Add lexical definition of event name
Hi, John
> > From: Shunsuke Nakamura <nakamura.shun@...fujitsu.com>
> >
> > Add the lexical definition of event name so that the numbers are recognizable.
> >
>
> Sorry for the hassle, but it's not clear that we got a definitive
> conclusion on this patch from v6 series:
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/YCuo01Wxxe%2FMCrC5@krava/
>
> Would it be so much worse for you to change format of these event names
> to not start with a numberic?
I was trying to match the specifications published by Fujitsu exactly.
We also thought that being able to parse event names starting with a number would be an improvement for perf.
We've discussed it with the team, but we decided to change the event name.
Best Regards
Shunsuke
Powered by blists - more mailing lists