linux-kernel - Re: [block] 52f019d43c: ndctl.test-libndctl.fail

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20210308070915.GA32695@lst.de>
Date:   Mon, 8 Mar 2021 08:09:15 +0100
From:   "hch@....de" <hch@....de>
To:     "Williams, Dan J" <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
Cc:     "hch@....de" <hch@....de>, lkp <lkp@...el.com>,
        "hare@...e.de" <hare@...e.de>,
        "olkuroch@...co.com" <olkuroch@...co.com>,
        "linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org" <linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org>,
        "lkp@...ts.01.org" <lkp@...ts.01.org>,
        "ming.lei@...hat.com" <ming.lei@...hat.com>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "axboe@...nel.dk" <axboe@...nel.dk>,
        "Sang, Oliver" <oliver.sang@...el.com>,
        "martin.petersen@...cle.com" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [block]  52f019d43c: ndctl.test-libndctl.fail

On Sat, Mar 06, 2021 at 08:33:04PM +0000, Williams, Dan J wrote:
> Yes, it looks like my unit test checks for exactly the behavior you
> changed. It was convenient to test that the device could be switched
> back to rw via BLKROSET, but I don't require that. The new behaviour of
> letting the disk->ro take precedence makes more sense to me, so I'll
> update the test for the new behaviour.
> 
> I.e. I don't think regressing a unit test counts as a userspace
> regression.

Ok, thanks for the confirmation.