[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACT4Y+YTjezgnY_KHzey1q_vDYD7jZCEHU6eOmKHnXYXbzUdcA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2021 08:12:36 +0100
From: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>
To: "Xu, Like" <like.xu@...el.com>
Cc: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Like Xu <like.xu@...ux.intel.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
KVM list <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
"Thomas Gleixner
(x86/pti/timer/core/smp/irq/perf/efi/locking/ras/objtool)
(x86@...nel.org)" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/perf: Fix guest_get_msrs static call if there is no PMU
On Mon, Mar 8, 2021 at 3:26 AM Xu, Like <like.xu@...el.com> wrote:
>
> On 2021/3/6 6:33, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> > Handle a NULL x86_pmu.guest_get_msrs at invocation instead of patching
> > in perf_guest_get_msrs_nop() during setup. If there is no PMU, setup
>
> "If there is no PMU" ...
>
> How to set up this kind of environment,
> and what changes are needed in .config or boot parameters ?
Hi Xu,
This can be reproduced in qemu with "-cpu max,-pmu" flag using this reproducer:
https://groups.google.com/g/syzkaller-bugs/c/D8eHw3LIOd0/m/L2G0lVkVBAAJ
> > bails before updating the static calls, leaving x86_pmu.guest_get_msrs
> > NULL and thus a complete nop.
>
> > Ultimately, this causes VMX abort on
> > VM-Exit due to KVM putting random garbage from the stack into the MSR
> > load list.
> >
> > Fixes: abd562df94d1 ("x86/perf: Use static_call for x86_pmu.guest_get_msrs")
> > Cc: Like Xu <like.xu@...ux.intel.com>
> > Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
> > Cc: Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>
> > Cc: kvm@...r.kernel.org
> > Reported-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
> > ---
> > arch/x86/events/core.c | 16 +++++-----------
> > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/events/core.c b/arch/x86/events/core.c
> > index 6ddeed3cd2ac..ff874461f14c 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/events/core.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/events/core.c
> > @@ -671,7 +671,11 @@ void x86_pmu_disable_all(void)
> >
> > struct perf_guest_switch_msr *perf_guest_get_msrs(int *nr)
> > {
> > - return static_call(x86_pmu_guest_get_msrs)(nr);
> > + if (x86_pmu.guest_get_msrs)
> > + return static_call(x86_pmu_guest_get_msrs)(nr);
>
> How about using "static_call_cond" per commit "452cddbff7" ?
>
> > +
> > + *nr = 0;
> > + return NULL;
> > }
> > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(perf_guest_get_msrs);
> >
> > @@ -1944,13 +1948,6 @@ static void _x86_pmu_read(struct perf_event *event)
> > x86_perf_event_update(event);
> > }
> >
> > -static inline struct perf_guest_switch_msr *
> > -perf_guest_get_msrs_nop(int *nr)
> > -{
> > - *nr = 0;
> > - return NULL;
> > -}
> > -
> > static int __init init_hw_perf_events(void)
> > {
> > struct x86_pmu_quirk *quirk;
> > @@ -2024,9 +2021,6 @@ static int __init init_hw_perf_events(void)
> > if (!x86_pmu.read)
> > x86_pmu.read = _x86_pmu_read;
> >
> > - if (!x86_pmu.guest_get_msrs)
> > - x86_pmu.guest_get_msrs = perf_guest_get_msrs_nop;
> > -
> > x86_pmu_static_call_update();
> >
> > /*
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists