lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2a21980b-7b0a-0de2-d417-09c7c80100cd@linux.intel.com>
Date:   Mon, 8 Mar 2021 16:35:07 +0800
From:   Like Xu <like.xu@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>, "Xu, Like" <like.xu@...el.com>
Cc:     Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
        Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
        Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
        Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
        KVM list <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner
         "(x86/pti/timer/core/smp/irq/perf/efi/locking/ras/objtool)"
         "(x86@...nel.org)" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/perf: Fix guest_get_msrs static call if there is no
 PMU

On 2021/3/8 15:12, Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 8, 2021 at 3:26 AM Xu, Like <like.xu@...el.com> wrote:
>>
>> On 2021/3/6 6:33, Sean Christopherson wrote:
>>> Handle a NULL x86_pmu.guest_get_msrs at invocation instead of patching
>>> in perf_guest_get_msrs_nop() during setup.  If there is no PMU, setup
>>
>> "If there is no PMU" ...
>>
>> How to set up this kind of environment,
>> and what changes are needed in .config or boot parameters ?
> 
> Hi Xu,
> 
> This can be reproduced in qemu with "-cpu max,-pmu" flag using this reproducer:
> https://groups.google.com/g/syzkaller-bugs/c/D8eHw3LIOd0/m/L2G0lVkVBAAJ

Sorry, I couldn't reproduce any VMX abort with "-cpu max,-pmu".
Doe this patch fix this "unexpected kernel reboot" issue ?

If so, you may add "Tested-by" for more attention.

> 
>>> bails before updating the static calls, leaving x86_pmu.guest_get_msrs
>>> NULL and thus a complete nop.
>>
>>> Ultimately, this causes VMX abort on
>>> VM-Exit due to KVM putting random garbage from the stack into the MSR
>>> load list.
>>>
>>> Fixes: abd562df94d1 ("x86/perf: Use static_call for x86_pmu.guest_get_msrs")
>>> Cc: Like Xu <like.xu@...ux.intel.com>
>>> Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
>>> Cc: Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>
>>> Cc: kvm@...r.kernel.org
>>> Reported-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
>>> ---
>>>    arch/x86/events/core.c | 16 +++++-----------
>>>    1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/x86/events/core.c b/arch/x86/events/core.c
>>> index 6ddeed3cd2ac..ff874461f14c 100644
>>> --- a/arch/x86/events/core.c
>>> +++ b/arch/x86/events/core.c
>>> @@ -671,7 +671,11 @@ void x86_pmu_disable_all(void)
>>>
>>>    struct perf_guest_switch_msr *perf_guest_get_msrs(int *nr)
>>>    {
>>> -     return static_call(x86_pmu_guest_get_msrs)(nr);
>>> +     if (x86_pmu.guest_get_msrs)
>>> +             return static_call(x86_pmu_guest_get_msrs)(nr);
>>
>> How about using "static_call_cond" per commit "452cddbff7" ?
>>
>>> +
>>> +     *nr = 0;
>>> +     return NULL;
>>>    }
>>>    EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(perf_guest_get_msrs);
>>>
>>> @@ -1944,13 +1948,6 @@ static void _x86_pmu_read(struct perf_event *event)
>>>        x86_perf_event_update(event);
>>>    }
>>>
>>> -static inline struct perf_guest_switch_msr *
>>> -perf_guest_get_msrs_nop(int *nr)
>>> -{
>>> -     *nr = 0;
>>> -     return NULL;
>>> -}
>>> -
>>>    static int __init init_hw_perf_events(void)
>>>    {
>>>        struct x86_pmu_quirk *quirk;
>>> @@ -2024,9 +2021,6 @@ static int __init init_hw_perf_events(void)
>>>        if (!x86_pmu.read)
>>>                x86_pmu.read = _x86_pmu_read;
>>>
>>> -     if (!x86_pmu.guest_get_msrs)
>>> -             x86_pmu.guest_get_msrs = perf_guest_get_msrs_nop;
>>> -
>>>        x86_pmu_static_call_update();
>>>
>>>        /*
>>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ