[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2a21980b-7b0a-0de2-d417-09c7c80100cd@linux.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2021 16:35:07 +0800
From: Like Xu <like.xu@...ux.intel.com>
To: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>, "Xu, Like" <like.xu@...el.com>
Cc: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
KVM list <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner
"(x86/pti/timer/core/smp/irq/perf/efi/locking/ras/objtool)"
"(x86@...nel.org)" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/perf: Fix guest_get_msrs static call if there is no
PMU
On 2021/3/8 15:12, Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 8, 2021 at 3:26 AM Xu, Like <like.xu@...el.com> wrote:
>>
>> On 2021/3/6 6:33, Sean Christopherson wrote:
>>> Handle a NULL x86_pmu.guest_get_msrs at invocation instead of patching
>>> in perf_guest_get_msrs_nop() during setup. If there is no PMU, setup
>>
>> "If there is no PMU" ...
>>
>> How to set up this kind of environment,
>> and what changes are needed in .config or boot parameters ?
>
> Hi Xu,
>
> This can be reproduced in qemu with "-cpu max,-pmu" flag using this reproducer:
> https://groups.google.com/g/syzkaller-bugs/c/D8eHw3LIOd0/m/L2G0lVkVBAAJ
Sorry, I couldn't reproduce any VMX abort with "-cpu max,-pmu".
Doe this patch fix this "unexpected kernel reboot" issue ?
If so, you may add "Tested-by" for more attention.
>
>>> bails before updating the static calls, leaving x86_pmu.guest_get_msrs
>>> NULL and thus a complete nop.
>>
>>> Ultimately, this causes VMX abort on
>>> VM-Exit due to KVM putting random garbage from the stack into the MSR
>>> load list.
>>>
>>> Fixes: abd562df94d1 ("x86/perf: Use static_call for x86_pmu.guest_get_msrs")
>>> Cc: Like Xu <like.xu@...ux.intel.com>
>>> Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
>>> Cc: Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>
>>> Cc: kvm@...r.kernel.org
>>> Reported-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
>>> ---
>>> arch/x86/events/core.c | 16 +++++-----------
>>> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/x86/events/core.c b/arch/x86/events/core.c
>>> index 6ddeed3cd2ac..ff874461f14c 100644
>>> --- a/arch/x86/events/core.c
>>> +++ b/arch/x86/events/core.c
>>> @@ -671,7 +671,11 @@ void x86_pmu_disable_all(void)
>>>
>>> struct perf_guest_switch_msr *perf_guest_get_msrs(int *nr)
>>> {
>>> - return static_call(x86_pmu_guest_get_msrs)(nr);
>>> + if (x86_pmu.guest_get_msrs)
>>> + return static_call(x86_pmu_guest_get_msrs)(nr);
>>
>> How about using "static_call_cond" per commit "452cddbff7" ?
>>
>>> +
>>> + *nr = 0;
>>> + return NULL;
>>> }
>>> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(perf_guest_get_msrs);
>>>
>>> @@ -1944,13 +1948,6 @@ static void _x86_pmu_read(struct perf_event *event)
>>> x86_perf_event_update(event);
>>> }
>>>
>>> -static inline struct perf_guest_switch_msr *
>>> -perf_guest_get_msrs_nop(int *nr)
>>> -{
>>> - *nr = 0;
>>> - return NULL;
>>> -}
>>> -
>>> static int __init init_hw_perf_events(void)
>>> {
>>> struct x86_pmu_quirk *quirk;
>>> @@ -2024,9 +2021,6 @@ static int __init init_hw_perf_events(void)
>>> if (!x86_pmu.read)
>>> x86_pmu.read = _x86_pmu_read;
>>>
>>> - if (!x86_pmu.guest_get_msrs)
>>> - x86_pmu.guest_get_msrs = perf_guest_get_msrs_nop;
>>> -
>>> x86_pmu_static_call_update();
>>>
>>> /*
>>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists