[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YEYOQqFch8yTE2SZ@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2021 13:45:06 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>
Cc: linux-gpio <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Marek Vasut <marex@...x.de>,
Roman Guskov <rguskov@...electronics.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] gpiolib: Read "gpio-line-names" from a firmware
node
On Sun, Mar 07, 2021 at 06:14:49PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 7, 2021 at 4:22 PM Bartosz Golaszewski
> <bgolaszewski@...libre.com> wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 5, 2021 at 1:02 PM Andy Shevchenko
> > <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > On STM32MP1, the GPIO banks are subnodes of pin-controller@...02000,
> > > see arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32mp151.dtsi. The driver for
> > > pin-controller@...02000 is in drivers/pinctrl/stm32/pinctrl-stm32.c
> > > and iterates over all of its DT subnodes when registering each GPIO
> > > bank gpiochip. Each gpiochip has:
> > >
> > > - gpio_chip.parent = dev,
> > > where dev is the device node of the pin controller
> > > - gpio_chip.of_node = np,
> > > which is the OF node of the GPIO bank
> > >
> > > Therefore, dev_fwnode(chip->parent) != of_fwnode_handle(chip.of_node),
> > > i.e. pin-controller@...02000 != pin-controller@...02000/gpio@...0*000.
> > >
> > > The original code behaved correctly, as it extracted the "gpio-line-names"
> > > from of_fwnode_handle(chip.of_node) = pin-controller@...02000/gpio@...0*000.
> > >
> > > To achieve the same behaviour, read property from the firmware node.
...
> > Did you run the OF unit tests on this? The check for the parent dev
> > was added after a bug was reported that was only triggered in unit
> > tests.
>
> Parent is not used anymore. But I can run unittests next week (or if
> you know that they are failing now, can you please show the failure?).
For the record:
[ 40.587868] ### dt-test ### end of unittest - 190 passed, 0 failed
If you have tests failed, we need more information about what line fails, etc.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists