linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 1/3] HID: intel-ish-hid: Drop if block with an always false condition

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <31028f589e27e246bb3b4b693caeb0b8eae3a285.camel@linux.intel.com>
Date:   Mon, 08 Mar 2021 08:03:49 -0800
From:   Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org>,
        Uwe Kleine-König <uwe@...ine-koenig.org>
Cc:     Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@...hat.com>,
        Enric Balletbo i Serra <enric.balletbo@...labora.com>,
        Guenter Roeck <groeck@...omium.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        linux-input@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/3] HID: intel-ish-hid: Drop if block with an always
 false condition

On Mon, 2021-03-08 at 11:07 +0100, Jiri Kosina wrote:
> On Sat, 6 Feb 2021, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> 
> > A remove callback is only ever called for a bound device. So there
> > is no
> > need to check for device or driver being NULL.
> 
> Srinivas, any objections to this patchset? The cleanups look good to
> me. 
Sorry, I missed this series.
No objection for taking these patches.

Thanks,
Srinivas


> Thanks,
>