[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <nycvar.YFH.7.76.2103081716200.12405@cbobk.fhfr.pm>
Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2021 17:16:54 +0100 (CET)
From: Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org>
To: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>
cc: Uwe Kleine-König <uwe@...ine-koenig.org>,
Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@...hat.com>,
Enric Balletbo i Serra <enric.balletbo@...labora.com>,
Guenter Roeck <groeck@...omium.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
linux-input@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/3] HID: intel-ish-hid: Drop if block with an always
false condition
On Mon, 8 Mar 2021, Srinivas Pandruvada wrote:
> > > A remove callback is only ever called for a bound device. So there
> > > is no
> > > need to check for device or driver being NULL.
> >
> > Srinivas, any objections to this patchset? The cleanups look good to
> > me.
> Sorry, I missed this series.
> No objection for taking these patches.
Thanks. Applied with your Acked-by:
If you disagree with that interpretation of your statement above, please
holler :)
Thanks,
--
Jiri Kosina
SUSE Labs
Powered by blists - more mailing lists