linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] docs: dt: submitting-patches: Fix grammar in subsystem section

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 9 Mar 2021 09:16:09 -0800
From:   Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
To:     Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
Cc:     devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] docs: dt: submitting-patches: Fix grammar in subsystem
 section

On 3/9/21 5:06 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Reword the subsystem bindings section to make sense, from a grammatical
> point of view.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>

Acked-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>

Thanks.

> ---
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/submitting-patches.rst | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/submitting-patches.rst b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/submitting-patches.rst
> index 68129ff09967d5d7..1d11c25249ff5465 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/submitting-patches.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/submitting-patches.rst
> @@ -75,8 +75,8 @@ II. For kernel maintainers
>       binding, and it hasn't received an Acked-by from the devicetree
>       maintainers after a few weeks, go ahead and take it.
>  
> -     Subsystem bindings (anything affecting more than a single device)
> -     then getting a devicetree maintainer to review it is required.
> +     For subsystem bindings (anything affecting more than a single device),
> +     getting a devicetree maintainer to review it is required.
>  
>    3) For a series going though multiple trees, the binding patch should be
>       kept with the driver using the binding.
> 


-- 
~Randy