linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] docs: dt: submitting-patches: Fix grammar in subsystem section

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87wnu81amn.fsf@meer.lwn.net>
Date:   Mon, 15 Mar 2021 13:26:40 -0600
From:   Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
To:     Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>
Cc:     devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] docs: dt: submitting-patches: Fix grammar in subsystem
 section

Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be> writes:

> Reword the subsystem bindings section to make sense, from a grammatical
> point of view.
>
> Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>
> ---
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/submitting-patches.rst | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/submitting-patches.rst b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/submitting-patches.rst
> index 68129ff09967d5d7..1d11c25249ff5465 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/submitting-patches.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/submitting-patches.rst
> @@ -75,8 +75,8 @@ II. For kernel maintainers
>       binding, and it hasn't received an Acked-by from the devicetree
>       maintainers after a few weeks, go ahead and take it.
>  
> -     Subsystem bindings (anything affecting more than a single device)
> -     then getting a devicetree maintainer to review it is required.
> +     For subsystem bindings (anything affecting more than a single device),
> +     getting a devicetree maintainer to review it is required.

Applied, thanks.

jon