linux-kernel - Re: [EXT] [PATCH v2 2/4] dt-bindings: spi: add compatible entry for imx8mp in FlexSPI controller

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <0a7e8287-b5f8-99ec-d521-0a85614461e2@denx.de>
Date:   Tue, 9 Mar 2021 07:44:18 +0100
From:   Heiko Schocher <hs@...x.de>
To:     Kuldeep Singh <kuldeep.singh@....com>,
        "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc:     Ashish Kumar <ashish.kumar@....com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Yogesh Gaur <yogeshgaur.83@...il.com>,
        "devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-spi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-spi@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [EXT] [PATCH v2 2/4] dt-bindings: spi: add compatible entry for
 imx8mp in FlexSPI controller

Hello Kuldeep,

On 09.03.21 07:29, Kuldeep Singh wrote:
>> Hi!
>>
>> On 09.03.21 06:56, Kuldeep Singh wrote:
>>> Hi Heiko,
>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: Heiko Schocher <hs@...x.de>
>>>> Sent: Tuesday, March 9, 2021 11:01 AM
>>>> To: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
>>>> Cc: Heiko Schocher <hs@...x.de>; Ashish Kumar <ashish.kumar@....com>;
>>>> Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>; Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>;
>>>> Yogesh Gaur <yogeshgaur.83@...il.com>; devicetree@...r.kernel.org;
>>>> linux- kernel@...r.kernel.org; linux-spi@...r.kernel.org
>>>> Subject: [EXT] [PATCH v2 2/4] dt-bindings: spi: add compatible entry
>>>> for imx8mp in FlexSPI controller
>>>>
>>>> Caution: EXT Email
>>>>
>>>> add compatible entry "nxp,imx8mp-fspi" in NXP FlexSPI controller
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Heiko Schocher <hs@...x.de>
>>>> ---
>>>>
>>>> (no changes since v1)
>>>>
>>>>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/spi-nxp-fspi.txt | 1 +
>>>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/spi-nxp-fspi.txt
>>>> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/spi-nxp-fspi.txt
>>>> index 7ac60d9fe3571..fd5f081f6d91b 100644
>>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/spi-nxp-fspi.txt
>>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/spi-nxp-fspi.txt
>>>> @@ -4,6 +4,7 @@ Required properties:
>>>>    - compatible : Should be "nxp,lx2160a-fspi"
>>>>                             "nxp,imx8qxp-fspi"
>>>>                             "nxp,imx8mm-fspi"
>>>> +                           "nxp,imx8mp-fspi"
>>>
>>> It seems the changes are not on top of tree. Please see[1] for latest changes
>> including imx8dxl entry.
>>> Snippet below:
>>>
>>> Required properties:
>>>   - compatible : Should be "nxp,lx2160a-fspi"
>>>                           "nxp,imx8qxp-fspi"
>>>                           "nxp,imx8mm-fspi"
>>>                           "nxp,imx8dxl-fspi"
>>
>> My patches are based on mainline..
>> *   144c79ef33536 - (origin/master, origin/HEAD) Merge tag 'perf-tools-fixes-for-
>> v5.12-2020-03-07'
>> of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/acme/linux (vor 32 Stunden)
>> <Linus Torvalds>
>>
>> Should I post this patch rebased on [1] or may all patches rebased on [1] ?
> 
> Hi Heiko,
> 
> As per cover letter, I can identify that first two are driver/Documentation patches and other two are device-tree patches.
> Device-tree patches(3/4 and 4/4) will go via Shawn tree (git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/shawnguo/linux.git)
> And initial two driver patches(1/4 and 2/4) will go via Mark's tree (git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/spi.git)
> 
> One approach I can think of is to send driver patches first and later send device-tree patches mentioning dependency on first two patches.

Yep, seems a good approach to me.

> Maybe Mark can comment here if he has any other opinion.

Yep, will wait for more comments, and if all is fine with this
patchset, I can split it into 2 series.

Thanks!

bye,
Heiko
-- 
DENX Software Engineering GmbH,      Managing Director: Wolfgang Denk
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: +49-8142-66989-52   Fax: +49-8142-66989-80   Email: hs@...x.de