[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YEk1+mDZ4u85RKL3@dhcp22.suse.cz>
Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2021 22:11:22 +0100
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>
To: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>
Cc: Muchun Song <songmuchun@...edance.com>, corbet@....net,
tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com, bp@...en8.de, x86@...nel.org,
hpa@...or.com, dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, luto@...nel.org,
peterz@...radead.org, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, paulmck@...nel.org,
mchehab+huawei@...nel.org, pawan.kumar.gupta@...ux.intel.com,
rdunlap@...radead.org, oneukum@...e.com, anshuman.khandual@....com,
jroedel@...e.de, almasrymina@...gle.com, rientjes@...gle.com,
willy@...radead.org, osalvador@...e.de, song.bao.hua@...ilicon.com,
david@...hat.com, naoya.horiguchi@....com,
joao.m.martins@...cle.com, duanxiongchun@...edance.com,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
Chen Huang <chenhuang5@...wei.com>,
Bodeddula Balasubramaniam <bodeddub@...zon.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v18 4/9] mm: hugetlb: alloc the vmemmap pages associated
with each HugeTLB page
On Wed 10-03-21 10:56:08, Mike Kravetz wrote:
> On 3/10/21 7:19 AM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > On Mon 08-03-21 18:28:02, Muchun Song wrote:
> > [...]
> >> @@ -1447,7 +1486,7 @@ void free_huge_page(struct page *page)
> >> /*
> >> * Defer freeing if in non-task context to avoid hugetlb_lock deadlock.
> >> */
> >> - if (!in_task()) {
> >> + if (in_atomic()) {
> >
> > As I've said elsewhere in_atomic doesn't work for CONFIG_PREEMPT_COUNT=n.
> > We need this change for other reasons and so it would be better to pull
> > it out into a separate patch which also makes HUGETLB depend on
> > PREEMPT_COUNT.
>
> Yes, the issue of calling put_page for hugetlb pages from any context
> still needs work. IMO, that is outside the scope of this series. We
> already have code in this path which blocks/sleeps.
>
> Making HUGETLB depend on PREEMPT_COUNT is too restrictive. IIUC,
> PREEMPT_COUNT will only be enabled if we enable:
> PREEMPT "Preemptible Kernel (Low-Latency Desktop)"
> PREEMPT_RT "Fully Preemptible Kernel (Real-Time)"
> or, other 'debug' options. These are not enabled in 'more common'
> kernels. Of course, we do not want to disable HUGETLB in common
> configurations.
I haven't tried that but PREEMPT_COUNT should be selectable even without
any change to the preemption model (e.g. !PREEMPT).
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
Powered by blists - more mailing lists