lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAL_Jsq+NcXHtDo+HEFVOEcGqYTx9Heo8dc_R5Nfz1Rr-sAu6YA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 10 Mar 2021 14:12:24 -0700
From:   Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To:     Shengjiu Wang <shengjiu.wang@...il.com>
Cc:     Shengjiu Wang <shengjiu.wang@....com>,
        "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" 
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux-ALSA <alsa-devel@...a-project.org>,
        Timur Tabi <timur@...nel.org>,
        Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
        linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
        Xiubo Li <Xiubo.Lee@...il.com>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>,
        Nicolin Chen <nicoleotsuka@...il.com>,
        Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
        Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/6] ASoC: dt-bindings: fsl_rpmsg: Add binding doc for
 rpmsg cpu dai driver

On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 6:33 AM Shengjiu Wang <shengjiu.wang@...il.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Rob
>
> On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 10:49 AM Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Mar 08, 2021 at 09:22:27PM +0800, Shengjiu Wang wrote:
> > > fsl_rpmsg cpu dai driver is driver for rpmsg audio, which is mainly used
> >
> > Bindings describe h/w blocks, not drivers.
>
> I will modify the descriptions. but here it is a virtual device.  the
> mapping in real h/w is cortex M core, Cortex M core controls the SAI,
> DMA interface. What we see from Linux side is a audio service
> through rpmsg channel.

It's describing the h/w from the view of the OS. It's not important
that it's a Cortex-M, but how you interface to it whether that's
shared registers, mailbox, etc. And it's what resources the block uses
that the OS controls.

> > > for getting the user's configuration from device tree and configure the
> > > clocks which is used by Cortex-M core. So in this document define the
> > > needed property.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Shengjiu Wang <shengjiu.wang@....com>
> > > ---
> > >  .../devicetree/bindings/sound/fsl,rpmsg.yaml  | 118 ++++++++++++++++++
> > >  1 file changed, 118 insertions(+)
> > >  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/fsl,rpmsg.yaml
> > >
> > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/fsl,rpmsg.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/fsl,rpmsg.yaml
> > > new file mode 100644
> > > index 000000000000..5731c1fbc0a6
> > > --- /dev/null
> > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/fsl,rpmsg.yaml
> > > @@ -0,0 +1,118 @@
> > > +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause)
> > > +%YAML 1.2
> > > +---
> > > +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/sound/fsl,rpmsg.yaml#
> > > +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> > > +
> > > +title: NXP Audio RPMSG CPU DAI Controller
> > > +
> > > +maintainers:
> > > +  - Shengjiu Wang <shengjiu.wang@....com>
> > > +
> > > +description: |
> > > +  fsl_rpmsg cpu dai driver is virtual driver for rpmsg audio, which doesn't
> > > +  touch hardware. It is mainly used for getting the user's configuration
> > > +  from device tree and configure the clocks which is used by Cortex-M core.
> > > +  So in this document define the needed property.
> > > +
> > > +properties:
> > > +  compatible:
> > > +    enum:
> > > +      - fsl,imx7ulp-rpmsg
> > > +      - fsl,imx8mn-rpmsg
> > > +      - fsl,imx8mm-rpmsg
> > > +      - fsl,imx8mp-rpmsg
> > > +
> > > +  model:
> > > +    $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/string
> > > +    description: User specified audio sound card name
> > > +
> > > +  clocks:
> > > +    items:
> > > +      - description: Peripheral clock for register access
> > > +      - description: Master clock
> > > +      - description: DMA clock for DMA register access
> > > +      - description: Parent clock for multiple of 8kHz sample rates
> > > +      - description: Parent clock for multiple of 11kHz sample rates
> > > +    minItems: 5
> >
> > If this doesn't touch hardware, what are these clocks for?
>
> When the cortex-M core support audio service, these clock
> needed prepared & enabled by ALSA driver.
>
> >
> > You don't need 'minItems' unless it's less than the number of 'items'.
>
> Ok, I will remove this minItems.
>
> >
> > > +
> > > +  clock-names:
> > > +    items:
> > > +      - const: ipg
> > > +      - const: mclk
> > > +      - const: dma
> > > +      - const: pll8k
> > > +      - const: pll11k
> > > +    minItems: 5
> > > +
> > > +  power-domains:
> > > +    maxItems: 1
> > > +
> > > +  fsl,audioindex:
> > > +    $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32
> > > +    enum: [0, 1]
> > > +    default: 0
> > > +    description: Instance index for sound card in
> > > +                 M core side, which share one rpmsg
> > > +                 channel.
> >
> > We don't do indexes in DT. What's this numbering tied to?
>
> I will remove it. it is not necessary
>
> >
> > > +
> > > +  fsl,version:
> >
> > version of what?
> >
> > This seems odd at best.
> >
>
> I will remove it.  it is not necessary
>
> > > +    $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32
> > > +    enum: [1, 2]
> >
> > You're going to update this with every new firmware version?
> >
> > > +    default: 2
> > > +    description: The version of M core image, which is
> > > +                 to make driver compatible with different image.
> > > +
> > > +  fsl,buffer-size:
> > > +    $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32
> > > +    description: pre allocate dma buffer size
> >
> > How can you have DMA, this doesn't touch h/w?
>
> The DMA is handled by M core image for sound playback
> and capture. we need to allocated buffer in Linux side.
> here just make the buffer size to be configurable.

Do we set audio buffer sizes for other audio devices in DT? If not,
why is this special? If so, why is it not common.

> > > +  fsl,enable-lpa:
> > > +    $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/flag
> > > +    description: enable low power audio path.
> > > +
> > > +  fsl,rpmsg-out:
> > > +    $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/flag
> > > +    description: |
> > > +      This is a boolean property. If present, the transmitting function
> > > +      will be enabled.
> > > +
> > > +  fsl,rpmsg-in:
> > > +    $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/flag
> > > +    description: |
> > > +      This is a boolean property. If present, the receiving function
> > > +      will be enabled.
> > > +
> > > +  fsl,codec-type:
> > > +    $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32
> > > +    enum: [0, 1, 2]
> > > +    default: 0
> > > +    description: Sometimes the codec is registered by
> > > +                 driver not by the device tree, this items
> > > +                 can be used to distinguish codecs.
> >
> > How does one decide what value to use?
>
> I will add more description:
> 0: dummy codec
> 1: WM8960 codec
> 2: AK4497 codec

I assume the last 2 cases have nodes in DT (pointed to by
'audio-codec'), so this is redundant.

> > > +
> > > +  audio-codec:
> > > +    $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/phandle
> > > +    description: The phandle of the audio codec
> >
> > The codec is controlled from the Linux side?
>
> yes.
>
> >
> > > +
> > > +  memory-region:
> > > +    $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/phandle
> > > +    description: phandle to the reserved memory nodes
> > > +
> > > +required:
> > > +  - compatible
> > > +  - fsl,audioindex
> > > +  - fsl,version
> > > +  - fsl,buffer-size
> > > +
> > > +additionalProperties: false
> > > +
> > > +examples:
> > > +  - |
> > > +    rpmsg_audio: rpmsg_audio {
> > > +        compatible = "fsl,imx8mn-rpmsg";
> > > +        fsl,audioindex = <0> ;
> > > +        fsl,version = <2>;
> > > +        fsl,buffer-size = <0x6000000>;
> > > +        fsl,enable-lpa;
> >
> > How does this work? Don't you need somewhere to put the 'rpmsg' data?
>
> The rpmsg data is not handled in this "rpmsg_audio" device, it is just to
> prepare the resource for rpmsg audio function, the clock, the memory
> the power...
>
> The rpmsg data is handled in imx-pcm-rpmsg.c and imx-audio-rpmsg.c
> These devices is registered by imx remoteproc driver.

Then what is 'memory-region' for? You need that, a mailbox, or ???
somewhere in DT.

Rob

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ