linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] [RFC] arm64: enable HAVE_LD_DEAD_CODE_DATA

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAKwvOdk4y3Ekc_TiWuk6D2KNbH_6YHZLRK9TtAnOP=cLP6E0Rw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 10 Mar 2021 14:02:24 -0800
From:   Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>
To:     kernel-toolchains@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>,
        Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>,
        Fangrui Song <maskray@...gle.com>,
        Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>,
        Andrew Scull <ascull@...gle.com>,
        Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        clang-built-linux <clang-built-linux@...glegroups.com>,
        David Brazdil <dbrazdil@...gle.com>,
        Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
        Ionela Voinescu <ionela.voinescu@....com>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
        Kristina Martsenko <kristina.martsenko@....com>,
        Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
        Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>,
        Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@....com>,
        Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
        Nicolas Pitre <nico@...xnic.net>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [RFC] arm64: enable HAVE_LD_DEAD_CODE_DATA_ELIMINATION

On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 1:08 PM Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 9:50 PM Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org> wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 1, 2021 at 10:11 AM Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com> wrote:
> > > Excerpts from Arnd Bergmann's message of February 27, 2021 7:49 pm:
>
> >
> > masahiro@...ar:~/ref/linux$ echo  'void this_func_is_unused(void) {}'
> > >>  kernel/cpu.c
> > masahiro@...ar:~/ref/linux$ export
> > CROSS_COMPILE=/home/masahiro/tools/powerpc-10.1.0/bin/powerpc-linux-
> > masahiro@...ar:~/ref/linux$ make ARCH=powerpc  defconfig
> > masahiro@...ar:~/ref/linux$ ./scripts/config  -e EXPERT
> > masahiro@...ar:~/ref/linux$ ./scripts/config  -e LD_DEAD_CODE_DATA_ELIMINATION
> > masahiro@...ar:~/ref/linux$
> > ~/tools/powerpc-10.1.0/bin/powerpc-linux-nm -n  vmlinux | grep
> > this_func
> > c000000000170560 T .this_func_is_unused
> > c000000001d8d560 D this_func_is_unused
> > masahiro@...ar:~/ref/linux$ grep DEAD_CODE_ .config
> > CONFIG_HAVE_LD_DEAD_CODE_DATA_ELIMINATION=y
> > CONFIG_LD_DEAD_CODE_DATA_ELIMINATION=y
> >
> >
> > If I remember correctly,
> > LD_DEAD_CODE_DATA_ELIMINATION dropped unused functions
> > when I tried it last time.
> >
> >
> > I also tried arm64 with a HAVE_LD_DEAD_CODE_DATA_ELIMINATION hack.
> > The result was the same.
> >
> >
> >
> > Am I missing something?
>
> It's possible that it only works in combination with CLANG_LTO now
> because something broke. I definitely saw a reduction in kernel
> size when both options are enabled, but did not try a simple test
> case like you did.
>
> Maybe some other reference gets created that prevents the function
> from being garbage-collected unless that other option is removed
> as well?

I wish the linker had a debug flag that could let developers discover
the decisions it made during --gc-sections as to why certain symbols
were retained/kept or not.
-- 
Thanks,
~Nick Desaulniers