[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2npq25ps-q960-795-96s5-rq6736pq693q@syhkavp.arg>
Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2021 17:08:36 -0500 (EST)
From: Nicolas Pitre <nico@...xnic.net>
To: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>
cc: kernel-toolchains@...r.kernel.org,
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>,
Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>,
Fangrui Song <maskray@...gle.com>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>,
Andrew Scull <ascull@...gle.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
clang-built-linux <clang-built-linux@...glegroups.com>,
David Brazdil <dbrazdil@...gle.com>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
Ionela Voinescu <ionela.voinescu@....com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Kristina Martsenko <kristina.martsenko@....com>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>,
Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@....com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [RFC] arm64: enable HAVE_LD_DEAD_CODE_DATA_ELIMINATION
On Wed, 10 Mar 2021, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 1:08 PM Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 9:50 PM Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org> wrote:
> > > On Mon, Mar 1, 2021 at 10:11 AM Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com> wrote:
> > > > Excerpts from Arnd Bergmann's message of February 27, 2021 7:49 pm:
> >
> > >
> > > masahiro@...ar:~/ref/linux$ echo 'void this_func_is_unused(void) {}'
> > > >> kernel/cpu.c
> > > masahiro@...ar:~/ref/linux$ export
> > > CROSS_COMPILE=/home/masahiro/tools/powerpc-10.1.0/bin/powerpc-linux-
> > > masahiro@...ar:~/ref/linux$ make ARCH=powerpc defconfig
> > > masahiro@...ar:~/ref/linux$ ./scripts/config -e EXPERT
> > > masahiro@...ar:~/ref/linux$ ./scripts/config -e LD_DEAD_CODE_DATA_ELIMINATION
> > > masahiro@...ar:~/ref/linux$
> > > ~/tools/powerpc-10.1.0/bin/powerpc-linux-nm -n vmlinux | grep
> > > this_func
> > > c000000000170560 T .this_func_is_unused
> > > c000000001d8d560 D this_func_is_unused
> > > masahiro@...ar:~/ref/linux$ grep DEAD_CODE_ .config
> > > CONFIG_HAVE_LD_DEAD_CODE_DATA_ELIMINATION=y
> > > CONFIG_LD_DEAD_CODE_DATA_ELIMINATION=y
> > >
> > >
> > > If I remember correctly,
> > > LD_DEAD_CODE_DATA_ELIMINATION dropped unused functions
> > > when I tried it last time.
> > >
> > >
> > > I also tried arm64 with a HAVE_LD_DEAD_CODE_DATA_ELIMINATION hack.
> > > The result was the same.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Am I missing something?
> >
> > It's possible that it only works in combination with CLANG_LTO now
> > because something broke. I definitely saw a reduction in kernel
> > size when both options are enabled, but did not try a simple test
> > case like you did.
> >
> > Maybe some other reference gets created that prevents the function
> > from being garbage-collected unless that other option is removed
> > as well?
>
> I wish the linker had a debug flag that could let developers discover
> the decisions it made during --gc-sections as to why certain symbols
> were retained/kept or not.
The GNU LD has --print-gc-sections to list those sections that were
dropped. And normally you should be able to find why a section wasn't
dropped by looking for dependencies in the linker map file.
Nicolas
Powered by blists - more mailing lists