[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAK8P3a1Nh4KUD85Fg_vFHf2fLMOqZThBgzyduLgfEtjGf-pm4g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2021 23:34:59 +0100
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: Alexandre Ghiti <alex@...ti.fr>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@...tuozzo.com>,
Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>,
Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>,
"open list:DOCUMENTATION" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-riscv <linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
kasan-dev <kasan-dev@...glegroups.com>,
linux-arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] Documentation: riscv: Add documentation that
describes the VM layout
On Sat, Mar 13, 2021 at 9:23 AM Alex Ghiti <alex@...ti.fr> wrote:
>
> Yes I considered it...when you re-proposed it :) I'm not opposed to your
> solution in the vmalloc region but I can't find any advantage over the
> current solution, are there ? That would harmonize with Linus's work,
> but then we'd be quite different from x86 address space.
>
> And by the way, thanks for having suggested the current solution in a
> previous conversation :)
Ah, I really need to keep track better of what I already commented on...
Arnd
Powered by blists - more mailing lists