[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <mhng-08cda2bf-fcd9-4848-b549-632d015e1acd@palmerdabbelt-glaptop>
Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2021 22:05:27 -0700 (PDT)
From: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>
To: alex@...ti.fr
CC: corbet@....net, Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
aou@...s.berkeley.edu, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
aryabinin@...tuozzo.com, glider@...gle.com, dvyukov@...gle.com,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kasan-dev@...glegroups.com,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Move kernel mapping outside the linear mapping
On Sat, 13 Mar 2021 01:26:47 PST (-0800), alex@...ti.fr wrote:
> Hi Palmer,
>
> Le 3/9/21 à 9:54 PM, Palmer Dabbelt a écrit :
>> On Thu, 25 Feb 2021 00:04:50 PST (-0800), alex@...ti.fr wrote:
>>> I decided to split sv48 support in small series to ease the review.
>>>
>>> This patchset pushes the kernel mapping (modules and BPF too) to the last
>>> 4GB of the 64bit address space, this allows to:
>>> - implement relocatable kernel (that will come later in another
>>> patchset) that requires to move the kernel mapping out of the linear
>>> mapping to avoid to copy the kernel at a different physical address.
>>> - have a single kernel that is not relocatable (and then that avoids the
>>> performance penalty imposed by PIC kernel) for both sv39 and sv48.
>>>
>>> The first patch implements this behaviour, the second patch introduces a
>>> documentation that describes the virtual address space layout of the
>>> 64bit
>>> kernel and the last patch is taken from my sv48 series where I simply
>>> added
>>> the dump of the modules/kernel/BPF mapping.
>>>
>>> I removed the Reviewed-by on the first patch since it changed enough from
>>> last time and deserves a second look.
>>>
>>> Alexandre Ghiti (3):
>>> riscv: Move kernel mapping outside of linear mapping
>>> Documentation: riscv: Add documentation that describes the VM layout
>>> riscv: Prepare ptdump for vm layout dynamic addresses
>>>
>>> Documentation/riscv/index.rst | 1 +
>>> Documentation/riscv/vm-layout.rst | 61 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>>> arch/riscv/boot/loader.lds.S | 3 +-
>>> arch/riscv/include/asm/page.h | 18 ++++++-
>>> arch/riscv/include/asm/pgtable.h | 37 +++++++++----
>>> arch/riscv/include/asm/set_memory.h | 1 +
>>> arch/riscv/kernel/head.S | 3 +-
>>> arch/riscv/kernel/module.c | 6 +--
>>> arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c | 3 ++
>>> arch/riscv/kernel/vmlinux.lds.S | 3 +-
>>> arch/riscv/mm/fault.c | 13 +++++
>>> arch/riscv/mm/init.c | 81 +++++++++++++++++++++++------
>>> arch/riscv/mm/kasan_init.c | 9 ++++
>>> arch/riscv/mm/physaddr.c | 2 +-
>>> arch/riscv/mm/ptdump.c | 67 +++++++++++++++++++-----
>>> 15 files changed, 258 insertions(+), 50 deletions(-)
>>> create mode 100644 Documentation/riscv/vm-layout.rst
>>
>> This generally looks good, but I'm getting a bunch of checkpatch
>> warnings and some conflicts, do you mind fixing those up (and including
>> your other kasan patch, as that's likely to conflict)?
>
>
> I fixed a few checkpatch warnings and rebased on top of for-next but had
> not conflicts.
>
> I have just sent the v2.
Thanks. These (and the second patch of the one I just put on fixes) are
for-next things, so I'm not going to get a look at them tonight because I want
to make sure we don't have any more fixes outstanding.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists