[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHp75Vc3Fr3Ysv0p7-W1Bf5y1Em17psZ=eCgVNewdVF=AjPm-g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2021 18:36:54 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To: David Laight <David.Laight@...lab.com>
Cc: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>,
Joel Becker <jlbec@...lplan.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Uwe Kleine-König
<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
Kent Gibson <warthog618@...il.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-doc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 02/11] configfs: use (1UL << bit) for internal flags
On Mon, Mar 15, 2021 at 5:33 PM David Laight <David.Laight@...lab.com> wrote:
> From: Bartosz Golaszewski
> > Sent: 15 March 2021 09:14
> >
> > From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>
> >
> > For better readability and maintenance: use the (1UL << bit) for flag
> > definitions.
>
> If the values ever get printed in hex the hex definitions are
> actually more useful.
Huh?!
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists