[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <509b836d-520d-4528-0f1a-da0c21e86c68@linaro.org>
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2021 10:04:46 +0000
From: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc: perex@...ex.cz, alsa-devel@...a-project.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, lgirdwood@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/7] ASoC: codecs: wcd938x: add basic controls
Thanks Mark for review,
On 12/03/2021 15:55, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 05:34:13PM +0000, Srinivas Kandagatla wrote:
>
>> + if (wcd938x->variant == WCD9380) {
>
> switch statements please.
>
>> + if (mode_val == CLS_H_HIFI || mode_val == CLS_AB_HIFI) {
>> + dev_info(component->dev,
>> + "%s:Invalid HPH Mode, default to CLS_H_ULP\n",
>> + __func__);
>> + mode_val = CLS_H_ULP;
>> + }
>
> If the value can't be set an error should be returned rather than the
> input ignored.
I agree with all the comments related to switch statements and ignoring
return values, will address them in next version.
>
>> +static int wcd938x_ear_pa_gain_get(struct snd_kcontrol *kcontrol,
>> + struct snd_ctl_elem_value *ucontrol)
>> +{
>> + struct snd_soc_component *component = snd_soc_kcontrol_component(kcontrol);
>> +
>> + ucontrol->value.integer.value[0] = snd_soc_component_read_field(component,
>> + WCD938X_ANA_EAR_COMPANDER_CTL,
>> + WCD938X_EAR_GAIN_MASK);
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>
> This just looks like a normal operation?
>
Yes, this can probably go into a TLV control, will fix this in next version.
--srini
>> +static int wcd938x_ear_pa_gain_put(struct snd_kcontrol *kcontrol,
>> + struct snd_ctl_elem_value *ucontrol)
>> +{
>> + struct snd_soc_component *component = snd_soc_kcontrol_component(kcontrol);
>> + struct wcd938x_sdw_priv *wcd = snd_soc_component_get_drvdata(component);
>> + struct wcd938x_priv *wcd938x = wcd->wcd938x;
>> +
>> + if (!wcd938x->comp1_enable) {
>> + snd_soc_component_write_field(component,
>> + WCD938X_ANA_EAR_COMPANDER_CTL,
>> + WCD938X_EAR_GAIN_MASK,
>> + ucontrol->value.integer.value[0]);
>> + }
>
> Again, values should not be ignored on error.
>
>> + if (wcd938x->variant == WCD9380) {
>> + ret = snd_soc_add_component_controls(component, wcd9380_snd_controls,
>> + ARRAY_SIZE(wcd9380_snd_controls));
>> + if (ret < 0) {
>> + dev_err(component->dev,
>> + "%s: Failed to add snd ctrls for variant: %d\n",
>> + __func__, wcd938x->variant);
>> + goto err;
>> + }
>> + }
>> + if (wcd938x->variant == WCD9385) {
>
> Again, switch statements - I'll never understand why people seem so
> intent on writing if trees :(
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists