lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 15 Mar 2021 12:46:44 +0000
From:   Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
To:     David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Cc:     Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
        Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>,
        Ian Kent <raven@...maw.net>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/3] vfs: Use an xarray instead of inserted
 bookmarks to scan mount list

On Mon, Mar 15, 2021 at 12:07:39PM +0000, David Howells wrote:
> 
> Hi Al, Miklós,
> 
> Can we consider replacing the "insert cursor" approach we're currently
> using for proc files to scan the current namespace's mount list[1] with
> something that uses an xarray of mounts indexed by mnt_id?
> 
> This has some advantages:
> 
>  (1) It's simpler.  We don't need to insert dummy mount objects as
>      bookmarks into the mount list and code that's walking the list doesn't
>      have to carefully step over them.
> 
>  (2) We can use the file position to represent the mnt_id and can jump to
>      it directly - ie. using seek() to jump to a mount object by its ID.
> 
>  (3) It might make it easier to use RCU in future to dump mount entries
>      rather than having to take namespace_sem.  xarray provides for the
>      possibility of tagging entries to say that they're viewable to avoid
>      dumping incomplete mount objects.

Usually one fully constructs the object, then inserts it into the XArray.

> But there are a number of disadvantages:
> 
>  (1) We have to allocate memory to maintain the xarray, which becomes more
>      of a problem as mnt_id values get scattered.

mnt_id values don't seem to get particularly scattered.  They're allocated
using an IDA, so they stay small (unlike someone using idr_alloc_cyclic
;-).

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ