lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YE9XdG1INdboLsbd@krava>
Date:   Mon, 15 Mar 2021 13:47:48 +0100
From:   Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
To:     Jackie Liu <jackieliu2113@...il.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jackie Liu <liuyun01@...inos.cn>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
        Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] perf tools: perf_event_paranoid and kptr_restrict may
 crash on 'perf top'

On Sat, Mar 13, 2021 at 02:02:46PM +0800, Jackie Liu wrote:
> After install the libelf-dev package and compiling perf, kptr_restrict=2
> and perf_event_paranoid=3 will cause perf top to crash, because the
> value of /proc/kallsyms cannot be obtained, which leads to
> info->jited_ksyms == NULL. In order to solve this problem, Add a
> judgment before use.
> 
> V2->V3:
> free info_linear memory and move code above, don't do those extra btf
> checks.
> 
> Suggested-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
> Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
> Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>
> Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Jackie Liu <liuyun01@...inos.cn>
> ---
>  tools/perf/util/bpf-event.c | 8 +++++++-
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/bpf-event.c b/tools/perf/util/bpf-event.c
> index 57d58c81a5f8..3c03c782bac6 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/bpf-event.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/bpf-event.c
> @@ -201,12 +201,18 @@ static int perf_event__synthesize_one_bpf_prog(struct perf_session *session,
>  	}

seems like the previous check miss free(info_linear) as well?
  
>  	info = &info_linear->info;
> +	if (!info->jited_ksyms) {
> +		free(info_linear);
> +		return -1;
> +	}
>  
>  	/* number of ksyms, func_lengths, and tags should match */
>  	sub_prog_cnt = info->nr_jited_ksyms;
>  	if (sub_prog_cnt != info->nr_prog_tags ||
> -	    sub_prog_cnt != info->nr_jited_func_lens)
> +	    sub_prog_cnt != info->nr_jited_func_lens) {
> +		free(info_linear);
>  		return -1;
> +	}
>  
>  	/* check BTF func info support */
>  	if (info->btf_id && info->nr_func_info && info->func_info_rec_size) {
> -- 
> 2.25.1
> 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ