linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/4] btrfs: Convert more kmaps to kmap_local

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20210316165658.GS3014244@iweiny-DESK2.sc.intel.com>
Date:   Tue, 16 Mar 2021 09:56:58 -0700
From:   Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com>
To:     dsterba@...e.cz, Chris Mason <clm@...com>,
        Josef Bacik <josef@...icpanda.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] btrfs: Convert more kmaps to kmap_local_page()

On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 12:07:24PM +0100, David Sterba wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 12, 2021 at 12:05:00PM -0800, Ira Weiny wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 12, 2021 at 08:41:41PM +0100, David Sterba wrote:
> > > On Tue, Feb 16, 2021 at 06:48:22PM -0800, ira.weiny@...el.com wrote:
> > > > From: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com>
> > > > 
> > > > I am submitting these for 5.13.
> > > > 
> > > > Further work to remove more kmap() calls in favor of the kmap_local_page() this
> > > > series converts those calls which required more than a common pattern which
> > > > were covered in my previous series[1].  This is the second of what I hope to be
> > > > 3 series to fully convert btrfs.  However, the 3rd series is going to be an RFC
> > > > because I need to have more eyes on it before I'm sure about what to do.  For
> > > > now this series should be good to go for 5.13.
> > > > 
> > > > Also this series converts the kmaps in the raid5/6 code which required a fix to
> > > > the kmap'ings which was submitted in [2].
> > > 
> > > Branch added to for-next and will be moved to the devel queue next week.
> > > I've added some comments about the ordering requirement, that's
> > > something not obvious. There's a comment under 1st patch but that's
> > > trivial to fix if needed. Thanks.
> > 
> > I've replied to the first patch.  LMK if you want me to respin it.
> 
> No need to respin, patchset now in misc-next. Thanks.

Sweet!  Thanks!
Ira