[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <34672AEE-B28E-4B07-BFDA-8DF2F20FD410@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2021 12:20:56 +0100
From: Álvaro Fernández Rojas <noltari@...il.com>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Cc: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
bcm-kernel-feedback-list <bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com>,
Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
Michael Walle <michael@...le.cc>,
Jonas Gorski <jonas.gorski@...il.com>,
Necip Fazil Yildiran <fazilyildiran@...il.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>,
"open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS"
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 00/22] pinctrl: add BCM63XX pincontrol support
Hi Linus,
> El 16 mar 2021, a las 11:13, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org> escribió:
>
> On Mon, Mar 15, 2021 at 12:42 PM Álvaro Fernández Rojas
> <noltari@...il.com> wrote:
>
>> v7: introduce changes suggested by Rob Herring.
>
> If Rob is happy with the bindings like this (GPIO as parallel node rathern
> than subnode) I am ready to merge this.
I appreciate that, but I’m having a hard time in understanding what Rob wants and since there are no examples available on most of the stuff he’s requesting this is really frustrating...
>
> As long as the bindings are OK I am pretty sure any remaining nits can
> be fixed in-tree.
>
> Yours,
> Linus Walleij
Best regards,
Álvaro.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists