linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH stable 0/6] net: dsa: b53: Correct learning for standalone ports

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20210317141409.wphejdjznrfyebmq@skbuf>
Date:   Wed, 17 Mar 2021 16:14:09 +0200
From:   Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>
To:     Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
        Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...il.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
        sashal@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH stable 0/6] net: dsa: b53: Correct learning for
 standalone ports

On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 05:35:43PM -0700, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> Hi Greg, Sasha, Jaakub and David,
> 
> This patch series contains backports for a change that recently made it
> upstream as f9b3827ee66cfcf297d0acd6ecf33653a5f297ef ("net: dsa: b53:
> Support setting learning on port") however that commit depends on
> infrastructure that landed in v5.12-rc1.
> 
> The way this was fixed in the netdev group's net tree is slightly
> different from how it should be backported to stable trees which is why
> you will find a patch for each branch in the thread started by this
> cover letter. The commit used as a Fixes: base dates back from when the
> driver was first introduced into the tree since this should have been
> fixed from day one ideally.
> 
> Let me know if this does not apply for some reason. The changes from 4.9
> through 4.19 are nearly identical and then from 5.4 through 5.11 are
> about the same.
> 
> Thank you very much!

Florian, same comment I just sent to Tobias applies to you as well:
could you please call b53_br_fast_age when disabling address learning?