linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH v3] ASoC: Intel: sof_rt5682: Add ALC1015Q-VB speaker amp support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <DM6PR11MB364290806B23636B6D0618DF976A9@DM6PR11MB3642.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Date:   Wed, 17 Mar 2021 15:37:55 +0000
From:   "Lu, Brent" <brent.lu@...el.com>
To:     Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com>,
        "alsa-devel@...a-project.org" <alsa-devel@...a-project.org>,
        Jack Yu <jack.yu@...ltek.com>
CC:     Oder Chiou <oder_chiou@...ltek.com>,
        Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
        Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
        Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>,
        "Takashi Iwai" <tiwai@...e.com>,
        "Rojewski, Cezary" <cezary.rojewski@...el.com>,
        "Jie Yang" <yang.jie@...ux.intel.com>,
        Kai Vehmanen <kai.vehmanen@...ux.intel.com>,
        Guennadi Liakhovetski <guennadi.liakhovetski@...ux.intel.com>,
        Rander Wang <rander.wang@...ux.intel.com>,
        "Zhi, Yong" <yong.zhi@...el.com>,
        Libin Yang <libin.yang@...ux.intel.com>,
        Ranjani Sridharan <ranjani.sridharan@...ux.intel.com>,
        "Nujella, Sathyanarayana" <sathyanarayana.nujella@...el.com>,
        "R, Dharageswari" <dharageswari.r@...el.com>,
        Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@...esas.com>,
        Fred Oh <fred.oh@...ux.intel.com>,
        Tzung-Bi Shih <tzungbi@...gle.com>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v3] ASoC: Intel: sof_rt5682: Add ALC1015Q-VB speaker amp
 support

> 
> The code is looks fine, but Jack Yu added a separate patch that makes
> RTL1019 equivalent to RTL1015, so should this patch also handle the
> RTL1019 case?

The topology used by this machine driver is using 48k, 64fs I2S format.
RT1019 needs to support this configuration. Not sure if RT1019 could
support that.


Regards,
Brent