[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d2d6f71a-851d-efc0-df17-bb5dcc8e776e@intel.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2021 13:31:39 -0700
From: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@...el.com>
To: Bhaskar Chowdhury <unixbhaskar@...il.com>, fenghua.yu@...el.com,
tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com, bp@...en8.de, x86@...nel.org,
hpa@...or.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, rdunlap@...radead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kernel: cpu: resctrl: Minor typo fix in the file
pseudo_lock.c
Hi Bhaskar,
On 3/17/2021 12:33 PM, Bhaskar Chowdhury wrote:
> On 10:54 Wed 17 Mar 2021, Reinette Chatre wrote:
>> Thank you very much for catching this typo.
>>
>> My feedback [1] to a previous patch from you applies here also. The
>> prefix should be "x86/resctrl:" for contributions to this area.
>>
> Thanks for the heads up!
This was the third time I mention this to you.
> Do you want another revision of it, or will you
> take it as it is???
If accepted I am not the one who will merge this patch so having a
version that is ready for merge (all feedback addressed) would be best.
> I am noting down your point ,so ,I might pull out next
> time I intend to sent out something to this specific area.
Please do note that my comment was not specific to resctrl. This prefix
style is used by x86 area.
Reinette
Powered by blists - more mailing lists