linux-kernel - Re: [net PATCH 3/9] octeontx2-af: Do not allocate memory for devlink private

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CALHRZup50=0yEhEmn8dOPuyNbrimocd6L5b_hkZTB-fRDM5+UA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 17 Mar 2021 11:10:55 +0530
From:   sundeep subbaraya <sundeep.lkml@...il.com>
To:     Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc:     Hariprasad Kelam <hkelam@...vell.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Sunil Kovvuri Goutham <sgoutham@...vell.com>,
        lcherian@...vell.com, Geetha sowjanya <gakula@...vell.com>,
        jerinj@...vell.com, Subbaraya Sundeep <sbhatta@...vell.com>
Subject: Re: [net PATCH 3/9] octeontx2-af: Do not allocate memory for devlink private

On Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 1:57 AM Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 16 Mar 2021 23:33:40 +0530 sundeep subbaraya wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 10:53 PM Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, 16 Mar 2021 14:57:07 +0530 Hariprasad Kelam wrote:
> > > > From: Subbaraya Sundeep <sbhatta@...vell.com>
> > > >
> > > > Memory for driver private structure rvu_devlink is
> > > > also allocated during devlink_alloc. Hence use
> > > > the allocated memory by devlink_alloc and access it
> > > > by devlink_priv call.
> > > >
> > > > Fixes: fae06da4("octeontx2-af: Add devlink suppoort to af driver")
> > > > Signed-off-by: Subbaraya Sundeep <sbhatta@...vell.com>
> > > > Signed-off-by: Hariprasad Kelam <hkelam@...vell.com>
> > > > Signed-off-by: Sunil Kovvuri Goutham <sgoutham@...vell.com>
> > >
> > > Does it fix any bug? Looks like a coding improvement.
> >
> > Without this we cannot fetch our private struct 'rvu_devlink'  from any
> > of the functions in devlink_ops which may get added in future.
>
> "which may get added in future" does not sound like it's fixing
> an existing problem to me :(
>
> If you have particular case where the existing setup is problematic
> please describe it in more detail, or mention what other fix depends
> on this patch. Otherwise sending this one patch for net-next would
> be better IMHO.

Sure will send this one patch to net-next.

Thanks,
Sundeep