linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: Tree for Mar 16 (AD9467 & ADI_AXI

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CA+U=DspHhL=Of2axKW6FiF3oG8S7FEP4QBLEZHc5VQ4LzmvqNQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 17 Mar 2021 10:16:01 +0200
From:   Alexandru Ardelean <ardeleanalex@...il.com>
To:     Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
Cc:     Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Michael Hennerich <michael.hennerich@...log.com>,
        linux-iio <linux-iio@...r.kernel.org>,
        William Breathitt Gray <vilhelm.gray@...il.com>,
        Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Mar 16 (AD9467 & ADI_AXI_ADC)

On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 11:20 PM Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org> wrote:
>
> On 3/15/21 9:50 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > News: there will be no linux-next release on Friday this week.
> >
> > Warning: Some of the branches in linux-next are still based on v5.12-rc1,
> > so please be careful if you are trying to bisect a bug.
> >
> > News: if your -next included tree is based on Linus' tree tag
> > v5.12-rc1{,-dontuse} (or somewhere between v5.11 and that tag), please
> > consider rebasing it onto v5.12-rc2. Also, please check any branches
> > merged into your branch.
> >
> > Changes since 20210315:
>
>
> on i386 or x86_64:
>
> WARNING: unmet direct dependencies detected for ADI_AXI_ADC
>   Depends on [n]: IIO [=y] && HAS_IOMEM [=y] && OF [=n]
>   Selected by [y]:
>   - AD9467 [=y] && IIO [=y] && SPI [=y]
>
>
> AD9467 should not select ADI_AXI_ADC when OF is not enabled,
> so possibly AD9467 should depend on OF.

Hmm, this becomes a bit complicated.
We got here because we needed to add a depends on HAS_IOMEM for the
ADI_AXI_ADC (due to the s390 arch).
Maybe a better fix would be for AD9467 to depend on ADI_AXI_ADC.
The AD9467 driver can't function without the ADI_AXI_ADC driver.

It is a little early to move this to a "high-speed ADC" subgroup.

>
>
> Full randconfig file is attached.
>
>
> --
> ~Randy
> Reported-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>