linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: Tree for Mar 16 (AD9467 & ADI_AXI

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <136e564b-bc81-19b6-ca3d-6fe5bac4d429@infradead.org>
Date:   Thu, 18 Mar 2021 11:44:39 -0700
From:   Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
To:     Alexandru Ardelean <ardeleanalex@...il.com>
Cc:     Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Michael Hennerich <michael.hennerich@...log.com>,
        linux-iio <linux-iio@...r.kernel.org>,
        William Breathitt Gray <vilhelm.gray@...il.com>,
        Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Mar 16 (AD9467 & ADI_AXI_ADC)

On 3/17/21 1:16 AM, Alexandru Ardelean wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 11:20 PM Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org> wrote:
>>
>> On 3/15/21 9:50 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> News: there will be no linux-next release on Friday this week.
>>>
>>> Warning: Some of the branches in linux-next are still based on v5.12-rc1,
>>> so please be careful if you are trying to bisect a bug.
>>>
>>> News: if your -next included tree is based on Linus' tree tag
>>> v5.12-rc1{,-dontuse} (or somewhere between v5.11 and that tag), please
>>> consider rebasing it onto v5.12-rc2. Also, please check any branches
>>> merged into your branch.
>>>
>>> Changes since 20210315:
>>
>>
>> on i386 or x86_64:
>>
>> WARNING: unmet direct dependencies detected for ADI_AXI_ADC
>>   Depends on [n]: IIO [=y] && HAS_IOMEM [=y] && OF [=n]
>>   Selected by [y]:
>>   - AD9467 [=y] && IIO [=y] && SPI [=y]
>>
>>
>> AD9467 should not select ADI_AXI_ADC when OF is not enabled,
>> so possibly AD9467 should depend on OF.
> 
> Hmm, this becomes a bit complicated.
> We got here because we needed to add a depends on HAS_IOMEM for the
> ADI_AXI_ADC (due to the s390 arch).
> Maybe a better fix would be for AD9467 to depend on ADI_AXI_ADC.
> The AD9467 driver can't function without the ADI_AXI_ADC driver.

Yes, "depends on" works here. Please go ahead with that change.
Thanks.

> It is a little early to move this to a "high-speed ADC" subgroup.
> 
>>
>>
>> Full randconfig file is attached.
>>
>>
>> --
>> ~Randy
>> Reported-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>


-- 
~Randy