[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <nycvar.YFH.7.76.2103191613470.12405@cbobk.fhfr.pm>
Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2021 16:14:07 +0100 (CET)
From: Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
TOTE Robot <oslab@...nghua.edu.cn>,
Jia-Ju Bai <baijiaju1990@...il.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.11 13/31] net: bonding: fix error return code of
bond_neigh_init()
On Fri, 19 Mar 2021, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
> > > index 5fe5232cc3f3..fba6b6d1b430 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
> > > @@ -3917,11 +3917,15 @@ static int bond_neigh_init(struct neighbour *n)
> > >
> > > rcu_read_lock();
> > > slave = bond_first_slave_rcu(bond);
> > > - if (!slave)
> > > + if (!slave) {
> > > + ret = -EINVAL;
> > > goto out;
> > > + }
> > > slave_ops = slave->dev->netdev_ops;
> > > - if (!slave_ops->ndo_neigh_setup)
> > > + if (!slave_ops->ndo_neigh_setup) {
> > > + ret = -EINVAL;
> > > goto out;
> > > + }
> >
> > This patch is completely broken and breaks bonding functionality
> > altogether for me.
>
> Is Linus's tree also broken for you? This showed up in 5.12-rc3.
Yes, it is.
--
Jiri Kosina
SUSE Labs
Powered by blists - more mailing lists