linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH v2 2/8] arm64: Implement frame types

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 19 Mar 2021 16:20:31 +0000
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     "Madhavan T. Venkataraman" <madvenka@...ux.microsoft.com>
Cc:     mark.rutland@....com, jpoimboe@...hat.com, jthierry@...hat.com,
        catalin.marinas@....com, will@...nel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        live-patching@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 2/8] arm64: Implement frame types

On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 10:02:52AM -0500, Madhavan T. Venkataraman wrote:
> On 3/19/21 9:40 AM, Madhavan T. Venkataraman wrote:

> > Actually now I look again it's just not adding anything on EL2 entries
> > at all, they use a separate set of macros which aren't updated - this
> > will only update things for EL0 and EL1 entries so my comment above
> > about this tracking EL2 as EL1 isn't accurate.

> So, do I need to do anything here?

Probably worth some note somewhere about other stack types existing and
how they end up being handled, in the changelog at least.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)